The examination of quality of pregnancy care based on the World Health Organization’s “Responsiveness” model of selected pregnant women in Tehran

Authors

  • Shahnaz Torkzahrani M.Sc. of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Quality, Responsiveness, Pregnancy care

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) Responsiveness model showing the ability of health systems in fulfilling people’s expectations in connection with nonclinical aspects is an appropriate pattern to assess healthcare. The purpose of this study was to determine the status of pregnancy care provisions based on the responsiveness model.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted by randomly sampling 130 women visiting selected hospitals in Tehran in 2015. A researcher-made questionnaire based on the responsiveness model of WHO was used to collect data. We determined the face validity and content validity of the questionnaire, and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.94) and test-retest analysis (0.96). The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS version 20 descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and Spearman correlation.

Results: Total responsiveness from the perspective of service recipients was 69.46±14.65 from 100. The obtained scores showed that, in the range of 0 to 100, 73.02 were about basic amenities (the most score), 72.93 about dignity, 70.91 about communication, 70.76 about confidentiality, 66.30 about provision social needs, 65.96 about choice of provider, 65.92 about autonomy, and 52.65 about prompt attention (the lowest score), which are representing the average level of service quality. There were significant relationships between participating in preparation class of labor and dignity (p<0.001), autonomy (p=0.01), provision social needs (p=0.01), and overall responsiveness (p=0.03). It was obtained that there is a significant linear relationship between scores given to hospitals and dimensions of responsiveness (p=0.05). Findings indicated a significant relationship between insurance type and dimensions of choice of provider (p=0.03) and communication (p=0.03).

Conclusion: The mean score of service quality in the present investigation illustrated that nonclinical dimensions have been disregarded and it has potential to be better. So some grand plans are needed.

References

Murray CJ, Frenk J. A WHO framework for health system performance assessment: Evidence and

Information for Policy, World Health Organization. 1999.

Organization World Health. Making a difference in countries: strategic approach to improving maternal

and newborn survival and health: ensuring skilled care for every birth. 2006.

McDevitt, Thomas M. World population profile: US Government Printing Office. 1996.

Srivastava A, Avan BI, Rajbangshi P, Bhattacharyya S. Determinants of women’s satisfaction with

maternal health care: a review of literature from developing countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;

(1): 97. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0525-0. PMID: 25928085, PMCID: PMC4417271.

De Silva A, Valentine N. A framework for measuring responsiveness. World Health Organization Geneva.

RamaRao S, Mohanam R. The quality of family planning programs: concepts, measurements,

interventions, and effects. Stud Fam Plann. 2003; 34(4): 227-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00227.x.

PMID: 14758606.

Spring S. ACNM quality management in midwifery practice American Collage of Nurse-midwives 1997.

Hulton L, Matthews Z, Stones RW. A framework for the evaluation of quality of care in maternity services.

Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A. The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service.

Journal of the academy of Marketing Science. 1993; 21(1): 1-12. doi: 10.1177/0092070393211001.

Redshaw M. Women as consumers of maternity care: measuring “satisfaction” or “dissatisfaction”? Birth.

; 35(1): 73-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00215.x. PMID: 18307491.

Kish JA. The development of maternal confidence for labor among nulliparous pregnant women. 2003.

The challenge & potential for assuring quality health care for the 21st century. Washington, DC: [U.S.

Dept. of Health and Human Services]: For sale by the U.S. G.P.O, Supt. of Docs, [distributor; 1999. 28 p.

p.

Rani M, Bonu S, Harvey S. Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India. Int J Qual Health Care.

; 20(1): 62-71. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm052. PMID: 18024998.

Karim RM, Abdullah MS, Rahman AM, Alam AM. Identifying influence of perceived quality and

satisfaction on the utilization status of the community clinic services; Bangladesh context. Bangladesh Med

Res Counc Bull. 2015; 41(1): 1-12. PMID: 27089628.

Reerink IH, Sauerborn R. Quality of primary health care in developing countries: recent experiences and

future directions. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996; 8(2): 131-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.2.131. PMID: 8792168.

Valentine NB, de Silva A, Kawabata K, Darby C, Murray CJ, Evans DB, et al. Health system

responsiveness: concepts, domains and operationalization. Health systems performance assessment:

debates, methods and empiricism. 2003; 573-96.

Gakidou E, Murray CJ, Frenk J. Measuring preferences on health system performance assessment. Geneva:

World Health Organization. 2000.

Bleich SN, Özaltin E, Murray CJ. How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patient

experience? Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2009; 87(4): 271-8. doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.050401.

Wisniewski M, Wisniewski H. Measuring service quality in a hospital colposcopy clinic. Int J Health Care

Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2005; 18(2-3): 217-28. doi: 10.1108/09526860510594776. PMID:

WHO. Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant. World Health Organization:

Geneva. 2004.

Ameriuon A, Jabbarzade Balkanlou M, Tofighi SH, Sepandi M, Ghanjal A. Study the relationship between

organizational justice and responsibility dimensions in selected hospitals of the armed forces. Journal of

nurse and physician within war. 2014; 25: 23-9. 22) Gharaee H, Bahrami M.A, Hamidi Y, Tapak L, Asqari R. The relationship between organizational climate

and responsiveness in Hamedan and yazd selective hospital in 2013. journal of healthcare management.

; 3(1-2(7)): 35-47.

Gromulska L, Supranowicz P, Wysocki MJ. Responsiveness to the hospital patient needs in Poland. Rocz

Panstw Zakl Hig. 2014; 65(2): 155-64. PMID: 25272583.

Karami-Tanha F, Moradi-Lakeh M, Fallah-Abadi H, Nojomi M. Health system responsiveness for care of

patients with heart failure: evidence form a university hospital. Arch Iran Med. 2014; 17(11): 736-40. doi:

/AIM.003. PMID: 25365611.

Liabsuetrakul T, Petmanee P, Sanguanchua S, Oumudee N. Health system responsiveness for delivery care

in Southern Thailand. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012; 24(2): 169-75. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr085. PMID:

Peltzer K. Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South Africa. BMC Health Serv Res.

; 9(1): 117. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-117. PMID: 19602290, PMCID: PMC2716320.

Bramesfeld A, Wedegärtner F, Elgeti H, Bisson S. How does mental health care perform in respect to

service users' expectations? Evaluating inpatient and outpatient care in Germany with the WHO

responsiveness concept. BMC Health Services Research. 2007; 7(1): 1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-99.

Rashidian A, Kavosi Z, Majdzadeh R, Pourreza A, Pourmalek F, Arab M, et al. Assessing health system

responsiveness: a household survey in 17th District of Tehran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2011; 13(5): 302- 8. PMID: 22737485, PMCID: PMC3371967.

Mohammadi A, Kamali K. Patients' Perspectives on Responsiveness in Outpatient Clinics of Hospitals at

Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. Preventive Care In Nursing & Midwifery Journal. 2015; 5(1): 80- 92.

Njeru MK, Blystad A, Nyamongo IK, Fylkesnes K. A critical assessment of the WHO responsiveness tool:

lessons from voluntary HIV testing and counselling services in Kenya. BMC health services research.

; 9(1): 1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-243.

Ugurluoglu O, Celik Y. How responsive Turkish health care system is to its citizens: the views of hospital

managers. J Med Syst. 2006; 30(6): 421-8. doi: 10.1007/s10916-005-9006-8. PMID: 17233154.

Sawyer A, Rabe H, Abbott J, Gyte G, Duley L, Ayers S. Parents' experiences and satisfaction with care

during the birth of their very preterm baby: a qualitative study. BJOG. 2013; 120(5): 637-43. doi:

1111/1471-0528.12104. PMID: 23289929, PMCID: PMC3613739.

Paudel YR, Mehata S, Paudel D, Dariang M, Aryal KK, Poudel P, et al. Women’s Satisfaction of Maternity

Care in Nepal and Its Correlation with Intended Future Utilization. International journal of reproductive

medicine. 2015; 2015: 9. doi: 10.1155/2015/783050.

Melese T, Gebrehiwot Y, Bisetegne D, Habte D. Assessment of client satisfaction in labor and delivery

services at a maternity referral hospital in Ethiopia. Pan Afr Med J. 2014; 17: 76. doi:

11604/pamj.2014.17.76.3189. PMID: 25018826, PMCID: PMC4085898.

Published

2022-01-18