Challenges of OSCE national board exam in Iran from participants’ perspective
Keywords:
Resident, Board exam, OSCE, Pediatrics, GynecologyAbstract
Background: The national board exam for residents in Iran is held in two parts: Multiple-choice and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The OSCE is a suitable method for evaluation of residents' clinical qualifications. However, it requires experienced human resources, accurate planning, facilities and reliable evaluation tools.
Objective: To determine the challenges of the OSCE National Board Exam in Iran.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on all the final-year pediatrics and gynecology residents of Mashhad University of Medical Science, who participated in the board exam in September 2014. A questionnaire was designed to evaluate the residents’ opinion on challenges of the OSCE. Data was analyzed with SPSS16. We used U Mann–Whitney test independent t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results: Fourteen pediatrics and eleven gynecology residents participated. In the gynecology group, there was no significant statistical correlation between the individual marks and questionnaire scores. However, in the pediatrics group, there was a significant correlation (p=0.046, r=-0.763). Based on pediatrics residents’ perspective, the main challenge of the OSCE part of the exam was the imbalance and disproportion between the allowed time and the task load in each exam stage. In other words, they believed that the tasks could not be fulfilled in the given time. In the gynecology group, the main challenge reported was the delay in announcing the exam results. In the pediatrics group, the main complaint was the disproportion of the allowed time and the task load in the exam stages.
Conclusion: Some of the challenges of the board exam were associated with the examiners and the exam environment, and some of them were related to the home university where the candidates had studied. To solve the problems, both aspects should be considered.
References
Pishkar Mofrad Z, Navidian A, Robabi H. An assessment of traditional and objective structured practical
evaluation methods on satisfaction of nursing students in Zahedan Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery: A
comparing. Journal of Medical Education and Development. 2013; 7(4): 2-14
Sadia S, Sultana S, Fareesa Waqar F. OSCE as an Assessment Tool: Perceptions of Undergraduate Medical
Students. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2009; 13(2): 17-9.
Jalili M, Mortazhejri S. Standard Setting for Objective Structured Clinical Exam Using Four Methods: Prefixed score, Angoff, Borderline Regression and Cohen’s. Strides Dev Med Educ. 2012; 9(1): 77-84.
Shumway JM, Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent
and reflective physician. Med Teach. 2003; 25(6): 569-84. doi: 10.1080/0142159032000151907. PMID:
Saboury A, Vahid Dastjerdi E, Mahdian M, Kharazifard MJ. Dental residents' perceptions of Objective
Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) as a clinical evaluation method. Journal of Dental School, Shahid
Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. 2010; 28(2): 88-94.
Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical
examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979; 13(1): 41-54. PMID: 763183.
Hilliard RI, Tallett SE. The use of an objective structured clinical examination with postgraduate residents
in pediatrics. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998; 152(1): 74-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.1.74. PMID:
Kargar FR, Derakhshan A, Makarem A. Assessment of Clinical Competency in Medical Sciences with
Emphasis On OSCE. Iran: Mashhad University of Medical Science; 2007; 288
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 KNOWLEDGE KINGDOM PUBLISHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
