A new strategy in neurocritical care nurse continuing stroke education

A hybrid simulation pilot study

Authors

  • Christopher Ryan Newey DO, MS, Assistant Professor of Neurology, Co-Director of Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Keywords:

Manikin, Critical care, Education, Cerebral hemorrhage

Abstract

Introduction: High-fidelity simulation is frequently utilized in medical education. Its use in the neurosciences is limited by the inherent limitations of the manikin to simulate neurological changes. We report here the use of a hybrid simulation – a combination of lecture and high-fidelity manikin – in the education of neurosciences nurses, involved in care of neurocritical care patients. 

Methods: Neurosciences nurses from at the University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA, which is an academic, tertiary-care medical center participated in the simulation during Spring of 2016. The simulation involved a patient presenting with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who neurologically deteriorated to brain death. Pre- and post-simulation questionnaires were administered using a questionnaire with five-point Liker scale. 

Results: Seventy-two responses were returned. The majority had 0-5 years of nursing experience with 83.8% having prior critical care experience. Pre-simulation, the majority of nurses (85.7%) agreed or strongly agreed with managing patients with ICH. When the responses of “agree” were compared to “strongly agree”, a significant improvement (p<0.001) in all responses except confidence in speaking with other healthcare providers was found.   

Conclusion: Nurses reported significant improvement in understanding and managing patients with acute ICH and neurological deterioration after participating in a neurocritical care hybrid simulation. This study shows the benefit of using hybrid simulation in the education of neurocritical care nurses.

 

References

Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria S Jr, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, et al. The utility of simulation in

medical education: what is the evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009; 76(4): 330-43. doi: 10.1002/msj.20127.

PMID: 19642147.

Kim J, Park JH, Shin S. Effectiveness of simulation-based nursing education depending on fidelity: a meta- analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16: 152. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0672-7. PMID: 27215280, PMCID:

PMC4877810.

American Heart Association. Advanced Cardiac Life Support. Available from: https://www.cpr.heart.org.

Accessed 6/13/2016.

Schwid HA, O’Donnell D. Anesthesiologists' management of simulated critical incidents. Anesthesiology.

; 76(4): 495-501. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199204000-00002. PMID: 1550273.

Hocker S, Schumacher D, Mandrekar J, Wijdicks EF. Testing confounders in brain death determination: a

new simulation model. Neurocrit Care. 2015; 23(3): 401-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-015-0130-0. PMID:

MacDougall BJ, Robinson JD, Kappus L, Sudikoff SN, Greer DM. Simulation-based training in brain death

determination. Neurocrit Care. 2014; 21(3): 383-91. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-9975-x. PMID: 24692109.

Dieckmann P, Lippert A, Glavin R, Rall M. When things do not go as expected: scenario life savers. Simul

Healthc. 2010; 5(4): 219-25. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e77f74. PMID: 21330800.

Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN. The 3D model of debriefing: defusing, discovering, and deepening.

Semin Perinatol. 2011; 35(2): 52-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.01.003. PMID: 21440811.

Waman KT, Nichols AA, O’Leary-Kelley C, Miller M. The evolution of a statewide network: the Bay Area

Simulation Collaborative. Simul Healthc. 2011; 6(6): 345-51. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822eaccc. PMID:

Dworetzky BA, Peyre S, Bubrick EJ, Milligan TA, Yule SJ, Doucette H, et al. Interprofessional simulation

to improve safety in the epilepsy monitoring unit. Epilepsy Behav. 2015; 45: 229-33. doi:

1016/j.yebeh.2015.01.018. PMID: 25812939.

Sperling JD, Clark S, Kang Y. Teaching medical students a clinical approach to altered mental status:

simulation enhances traditional curriculum. Med Educ Online. 2013; 18: 1-8. doi:

3402/meo.v18i0.19775. PMID: 23561054, PMCID: PMC3617787.

Neurocritical Care Society. Emergency Neurologic Life Support Series. Neurocrit Care. 2015; Suppl 2.

Available from: https://www.enlsprotocols.org. Accessed 6/13/2016.

Published

2022-01-18

Issue

Section

Articles