Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in spinal abnormalities among children with neurogenic bladder
Keywords:
Neurogenic bladder, Ultrasonography, Magnetic resonance imagingAbstract
Background: Nowadays, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for evaluation and diagnosis of spinal cord abnormalities, which are considered among the leading causes of neurogenic bladder; however, MRI is a costly imaging method and is not available at all health centers. Sporadic studies have shown the alignment of MRI with ultrasonography results in diagnosis of spinal abnormalities; although none of these studies has expressed the diagnostic value of ultrasonography.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonography in detection of spinal abnormalities in children with neurogenic bladder.
Methods: This is a cross-sectional study carried out from January 2014 to November 2015 on patients with neurogenic bladder referred to Department of Radiology, Dr. Sheikh Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. All patients underwent sonography of the spinal cord and soft-tissue masses; also, a spinal MRI scan was performed. The existence of spina bifida, sacral agenesis, posterior vertebral arch defects, mass, tethered cord, myelomeningocele, lipoma and fatty infiltration, dural ectasia, hydromyelia and syringomyelia, and diastomatomyelia was recorded during each imaging scan. Chi-square and Fisher’s tests were used for data analysis using SPSS 19.0 software, and the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography findings were calculated by MedCale 26 software.
Results: Forty patients with neurogenic bladder (22 males/18 females), with an average of 25.73±19.15 months, were enrolled. The most common abnormality was found in patients’ MRI was tethered cord syndrome (70%). There was a significant relationship between ultrasonographic and MRI findings in spina bifida abnormalities (p=0.016), sacral agenesis (p=0.00), tethered cord (p=0.00), myelomeningocele (p=0.00), and lipoma and fatty infiltration (p=0.01). Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 20.0%-100% and a specificity of 85.7%–100% depending on the detected type of abnormality.
Conclusion: It seems that ultrasonography has an acceptable and desirable sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of most of the spinal cord abnormalities except for dural ectasia, hydromyelia and syringomyelia, diastomatomyelia, and the spinal cord masses in children with a neurogenic bladder.
References
Fowler CJ. Neurological disorders of micturition and their treatment. Brain. 1999; 122(7): 1213-31. doi:
1093/brain/122.7.1213. PMid: 10388789.
Gerscovich EO, Maslen L, Cronan MS, Poirier V, Anderson MW, McDonald C, et al. Spinal sonography
and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with repaired myelomeningocele: comparison of modalities. J
Ultrasound Med. 1999; 18(9): 655-64. doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.9.655, PMid: 10478975.
Henriques JGdB, Pianetti Filho G, Costa PR, Henriques KSW, Perpétuo FOL. Screening of occult spinal
dysraphism by ultrasonography. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2004; 62(3A): 701-6. PMid: 15334234.
Kent D, Haynor D, Larson E, Deyo R. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the
accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 158(5): 1135-44. doi:
2214/ajr.158.5.1533084. PMid: 1533084.
Missere M, Natale S, Maria AC, Sicuranza G, Raffi GB. Use of ultrasound in occupational risk assessment
of low-back pain. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 1999; 50(2): 189-92. PMid: 10566196.
Unsinn KM, Geley T, Freund MC, Gassner I. US of the Spinal Cord in Newborns: Spectrum of Normal
Findings, Variants, Congenital Anomalies, and Acquired Diseases 1. Radiographics. 2000; 20(4): 923-38.
doi: 10.1148/radiographics.20.4.g00jl06923. PMid: 10903684.
Gerscovich EO, Maslen L, Cronan MS, Poirier V, Anderson MW, McDonald C, et al. Spinal sonography
and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with repaired myelomeningocele: comparison of modalities. J
Ultrasound Med. 1999 Sep; 18(9): 655-64. doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.9.655, PMID: 10478975.
Chern JJ, Aksut B, Kirkman JL, Shoja MM, Tubbs RS, Royal SA, et al. The accuracy of abnormal lumbar
sonography findings in detecting occult spinal dysraphism: a comparison with magnetic resonance
imaging: Clinical article. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2012; 10(2): 150-3. doi:
3171/2012.5.peds11564.
Sasani M, Asghari B, Asghari Y, Afsharian R, Ozer AF. Correlation of cutaneous lesions with clinical
radiological and urodynamic findings in the prognosis of underlying spinal dysraphism disorders. Pediatr
Neurosurg. 2008; 44(5): 360-70. doi: 10.1159/000149901. PMid: 18703880.
Lode H, Deeg K, Krauss J. Spinal sonography in infants with cutaneous birth markers in the lumbo-sacral
region-an important sign of occult spinal dysrhaphism and tethered cord. Ultraschall Med. 2008; 29(5):
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963169. PMid: 17610175.
Rohrschneider WK, Forsting M, Darge K, Tröger J. Diagnostic value of spinal US: comparative study with
MR imaging in pediatric patients. Radiology. 1996; 200(2): 383-8. doi: 10. 1148/radiology. 200. 2.
PMid: 8685330.
Sattar T, Bannister CM, Russell SA, Rimmer S. Pre-natal diagnosis of occult spinal dysraphism by
ultrasonography and post-natal evaluation by MR scanning. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 8(Suppl): 31-3. doi:
1055/s-2008-1071249. PMid: 9926321.
Van den Hondel D, Sloots C, De Jong TH, Lequin M, Wijnen R. Screening and Treatment of Tethered
Spinal Cord in Anorectal Malformation Patients. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016; 26(1): 22-8. PMid: 26394371.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 KNOWLEDGE KINGDOM PUBLISHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
