Effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on micro-shear bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics
Keywords:
Glass ceramic; Hydrofluoric acid; Resin cement; CAD/CAM; AdhesionaAbstract
Introduction: Dental ceramics are appreciated as highly esthetic restorative materials that can simulate the appearance of natural dentition better than other materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration and etching time on micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) to IPS e.max CAD and Vita Mark II of a dual cured resin cement (Panavia F2.0).
Methods: This study was an experimental in vitro study, performed in the dental material research center of Babol University of Medical Sciences in 2016. Two hydrofluoric acid concentrations (5% and 10%) and three different etching times (20, 60 and 120 seconds) were used to etch the specimens respectively. A silane coupling agent (Clearfil porcelain activator) and priming and bonding agent (Clearfil SE bond) were used on the etched surfaces in accordance to the manufacturer’s instructions of use. Then resin cement was applied on the prepared ceramic surfaces and light cured. µSBS between resin cement and the porcelains were measured with a universal testing machine. Mode of failure was observed with 40x magnification by means of a Stereo microscope. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and independent-samples t-test and Chi-square tests.
Results: In both e.max and Vita Mark II groups, µSBS were not significantly different when different etching times (one-way ANOVA) and HF acid concentrations (Independent-samples t-test) were used (p>0.05), but the highest µSBS was shown in e.max specimens etched 60 s with 5% HF and Vita Mark II specimens etched 20 s with 10% HF. µSBS of e.max was significantly higher than Vita Mark II (p=0.00).
Conclusion: Best surface treatment for e.max and Vita Mark II ceramics is 20 s etch using 5 % hydrofluoric acid.
References
Xiaoping L, Dongfeng R, Silikas N. Effect of etching time and resin bond on the flexural strength of IPS
e.max Press glass ceramic. Dent Mater. 2014; 30(12): e330–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.373. PMID:
Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J
Prosthodont Res. 2013; 57(4): 236–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001. PMID: 24140561.
Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: State of the
art. J Prosthodont Res. 2014; 58(4): 208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003. PMID: 25172234.
Powers JM, Farah JW, O’Keefe KL, Kolb B, Udrys G. Guide to all-ceramic bonding. Dental Advisor. 2009; 2: 1-12.
Liu PR, Essig ME. Panorama of dental CAD/CAM restorative systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008;
(8): 482–8. PMID: 18935787.
Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys D, Nevia G. A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate
CAD/CAM crowns. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010; 141: 10S-4S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0355. PMID:
Kon M, Kawano F, Asaoka K, Matsumoto N. Effect of leucite crystals on the strength of glassy porcelain.
Dent Mater. 1994; 13(2): 138–47. doi: 10.4012/dmj.13.138. PMID: 7758273.
Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont. 1995;
(3): 239–46. PMID: 10348592.
Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF. Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J
Prosthet Dent. 1995; 74(2): 45–50. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80177-5. PMID: 8537920.
Denry IL, Mackert Jr. JR, Holloway JA, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of cubic leucite stabilization on the flexural
strength of feldspathic dental porcelain. J Dent Res. 1996; 75(12): 1928–35. doi:
1177/00220345960750120301. PMID: 9033446.
Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to
ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003; 19(8): 725–31. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8. PMID: 14511730.
Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature.
Journal of dentistry. 2000; 28(3): 163-77. doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00066-4. PMID: 10709338.
Van Noort R, Barbour ME. Introduction to Dental Materials. 4th Edition. Introduction to Dental Materials.
Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res.
; 66(9): 1460–5. doi: 10.1177/00220345870660091001. PMID: 3305639.
Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. The impact of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on the
performance of a porcelain laminate restorative material. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(4): 461-8. doi:
1016/j.dental.2006.03.002.
Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to
porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent. 1998; 23: 250-7. PMID: 9863446.
Zogheib LV, Della Bona A. Effect of hydrofluoric acid etching duration on the roughness and flexural
strength of a lithium disilicate-based glass ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2001; 22(1): 45-50. doi: 10.1590/S0103- 64402011000100008. PMID: 21519648.
Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite
resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dent. 1998; 26(1): 53-8. doi: 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00078-4.
Jardel V, Degrange M, Picard B, Derrien G. Surface energy of etched ceramic. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;
(5): 415-8. PMID: 10709522.
Lu R, Harcourt JK, Tyas MJ, Alexander B. An investigation of the composite resin/porcelain interface.
Aust Dent J. 1992; 37: 12-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1992.tb00827.x. PMID: 1567289.
Nagayassu MP, Shintome LK, Uemura ES, Araujo JE. Effect of Surface Treatment on the Shear Bond
Strength of a Resin-Based Cement to Porcelain. Braz Dent J. 2006; 17(4): 290-5. doi: 10.1590/S0103- 64402006000400005. PMID: 17262141.
Tylka DF, Stewart GP. Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for
porcelain-composite repair. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 72(2): 121-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90067-1.
PMID: 7932255.
Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass
ceramics. Dent Mater. 2002; 18(5): 380-8. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00054-9. PMID: 12175577.
Güler AU, Yilmaz F, Yenisey M, Güler E, Ural Ç. Effect of acid etching time and a self-etching adhesive
on the shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Adhes Dent. 2006; 8(1): 21-5. PMID:
Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Hood JA. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on tensile bond strength to a
resin cement. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15(3): 248-55. PMID: 12066487.
Stona D, Burnett LH, Mota EG, Spohr AM. Fracture resistance of computer-aided design and computer- aided manufacturing ceramic crowns cemented on solid abutments. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015; 146(7): 501-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.02.012. PMID: 26113098.
Badawy R, El-Mowafy O, Tam LE. Fracture toughness of chairside CAD/CAM materials–Alternative
loading approach for compact tension test. Dent Mater. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.003. PMID:
Wolf DM, Powers JM, O'Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to etched and sandblasted porcelain. Am J
Dent. 1993; 6(3): 155-8. PMID: 8240779.
Hooshmand T, Parvizi S, Keshvad A. Effect of surface acid etching on the biaxial flexural strength of two
hot-pressed glass ceramics. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17(5): 415-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00319.x.
PMID: 18482364.
Subasi G, Inan O. Shear Bond Strength of Three Porcelain Repair Systems on Porcelain in Dry and Aged
Conditions. Dentistry 2012; 2: 119-25. doi: 10.4172/2161-1122.1000119.
Chaiyabutr Y, McGowan S, Phillips KM, Kois JC, Giordano RA. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface
treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100(3): 194-202. doi:
1016/S0022-3913(08)60178-X. PMID: 18762031.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 KNOWLEDGE KINGDOM PUBLISHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
