Designing and validation

A questionnaire of hope for family members of patients hospitalized in intensive care unit

Authors

  • Foad Rahimi Ph.D. Student in Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, International Campus, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: Families of patients are faced with stressors in the intensive care unit (ICU) that cannot be controlled sometimes. Having hope is one of the strategies for obtaining self-control in patients’ families, which deals with such situations.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to design and validate a questionnaire of hope for family members of patients hospitalized in intensive care units.

Methods: This study was conducted for family members of patients hospitalized in the intensive care units of Kurdistan and Tehran provinces, in Iran, between the years 2015-2016. In this study, 126 family members were selected using convenience sampling. The study was conducted using a questionnaire of hope scale for family members of patients hospitalized in intensive care units and demographic characteristics. During the study, construct and criterion validity of the tool was determined. The Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test-retest coefficient. Data were analyzed through factor analysis, correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity of the scale was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). 

Results: Participants in this study included 12 family members of patients hospitalized in the intensive care units. Cronbach's alpha coefficients obtained from analysis of questionnaires completed by family members of patients was 0.916. Cronbach's alpha under the first scale (compatibility) was 0.898, Cronbach's alpha of the second subscale (self-confidence) was 87%, Cronbach's alpha under the third subscale (Sense of responsibility) was 0.770. The fourth subscale (Looking to the future) was 0.571. Pearson correlation coefficients between the scores obtained from two family members responses to the hope scale were 0.939 which showed that scale stability was average. As a result, exploratory factor analysis, four factors were found that were named according to the statements of each group. 

Conclusion: Consistency coefficients between the two tests was 0.939 that the stability over time the questionnaire was confirmed. A questionnaire of hope in the intensive care unit can measure different dimensions of hope to the families of these patients and help to improve the care of these patients. Validity and reliability of "scale for hope of families of these patients" was appropriate and it could be used to measure hope in families of these patients.

References

Abrishamkar S, Jivad N. Epidemiological analysis of head trauma in patients admitted to Kashani hospital

in Shahrekord. Shahrekord Univ Med Sci J. 2004; 4(5): 27-32.

Amendolia B. Hope and parents of the critically ill newborn: a concept analysis. Adv Neonatal Care. 2010;

(3): 140-4. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e3181dee83b. PMID: 20505424.

Bland R, Darlington Y. The Nature and Sources of Hope: Perspectives of Family Caregivers of People

With Serious Mental Illness. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2002; 38(2): 61-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1744- 6163.2002.tb00658.x. PMID: 12132632.

Blanch D, Karkada S. Relationship between stress, coping and nursing support of patients admitted to

intensive care units of Karnataka, India. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2009; 15(2): 152-8.

Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

Psychol Bull. 1995; 56(2): 81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016. PMID: 13634291.

Clarke DM, Kissane DW. Demoralization: its phenomenology and importance. Aust N Z J Psychiatry.

; (36): 733-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01086.x. PMID: 12406115.

Chien WT, Chiu YL, Lam LW, Ip WY. Effects of a needs-based education programme for family carers

with a relative in an intensive care unit: a quasi-experimental study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006: 43(1): 39-50.

doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.01.006. PMID: 16183062.

Miller J, Powers MJ. Development of an instrument to measure hope. Journal of Nurs Res. 1998; 37: 6-9.

Miller JF. Hope to healing: A Construct Central to Intensive Cares Nursing Nursing. Journal of Nursing

care. 2007; 42(1): 12-9.

Herth K. Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation. J Adv Nurs.

; 17: 1251-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01843.x. PMID: 1430629.

Snyder CR, Cheavans J, Michael ST. Coping, the psychology of what works. Journal of Oxford University.

: 205-31.

Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three Approaches to Qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):

-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687. PMID: 16204405.

Hinds PS, Gattuso JS. Measuring hopefulness in adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing. 1998;

(2): 92-4.

Kim DS, Kim HS, Schwartz-Barcott D, Zucker D. The nature of hope in hospitalized chronically ill

patients. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006; 43: 547–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.07.010. PMID: 16140301.

Morse JM. Approaches to Qualitative and Quantitative Methodological Triangulation. Journal of Nursing

Research. 1995; 40(2): 120-3.

LoBiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Journal of Nursing Research. 6th Edition. USA, St Louis: Mosby Co; 2006;

: 467–526.

Miller JF. Hope: a construct central to nursing. Journal of Nursing research. 2007; 42: 12-9.

Farran CJ, Herth KA. Hope and hopelessness. Journal of Critical clinical constructs. 1995; 11(3): 82-99.

Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative Content Analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and

measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24: 105-12. doi:

1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001. PMID: 14769454.

Published

2022-02-12