Developing a conceptual model for the application of patient and public involvement in the healthcare system in Iran

Authors

  • Batoul Ahmadi Ph.D. of Health Services Management, Associate Professor, Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Women's Health Scientific Group, Iranian Academy of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Patient and public involvement, Conceptual model, Healthcare system, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Patient and public involvement is engaging patients, providers, community representatives, and the public in healthcare planning and decision-making. The purpose of this study was to develop a model for the application of patient and public involvement in decision making in the Iranian healthcare system. 

Methods: A mixed qualitative-quantitative approach was used to develop a conceptual model. Thirty three  key informants were purposely recruited in the qualitative stage, and 420 people (patients and their companions) were included in a protocol study that was implemented in five steps: 1) Identifying antecedents, consequences, and variables associated with the patient and the publics’ involvement in  healthcare decision making through a comprehensive literature review; 2) Determining the main variables in the context of Iran's health system using conceptual framework analysis; 3) Prioritizing and weighting variables by Shannon entropy; 4) designing and validating a tool for patient and public involvement in healthcare decision making; and 5) Providing a conceptual model of patient and the public involvement in planning and developing healthcare using structural equation modeling. We used various software programs, including SPSS (17), Max QDA (10), EXCEL, and LISREL. Content analysis, Shannon entropy, and descriptive and analytic statistics were used to analyze the data.

Results: In this study, seven antecedents variable, five dimensions of involvement, and six consequences were identified. These variables were used to design a valid tool. A logical model was derived that explained the logical relationships between antecedent and consequent variables and the dimensions of patient and public involvement as well. 

Conclusion: Given the specific context of the political, social, and innovative environments in Iran, it was necessary to design a model that would be compatible with these features. It can improve the quality of care and promote the patient and the public satisfaction with healthcare and legitimate the representative of people they served for. This model can provide a practical guide for managers and policy makers to involve people in making the decisions that influence their lives.

References

Church J, Saunders D, Wanke M, Pong R, Spooner C, Dorgan M. Citizen Participation in health decision- making: past experience and future prospects. J Public Health Policy. 2002; 23(3): 12-32. doi:

2307/3343116, PMID: 12013713.

Declaration of Alma-Ata. International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma- Ata, USSR, 6–12

September 1978. Available from: http://www.who.int/hpr/archive/docs/almaata.html

Department of Health. Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS, London: Stationary Office, 1999.

Health Canada, Public Involvement: Model and Guidelines, Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and

Government Services, 2000.

Kitzhaber JA, 1993. Prioritizing health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience. B M J. 1993;

(6900): 373-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6900.373, PMID: 8374424, PMCID: PMC1678226.

World Health Organization, Regional Health Systems Observatory- EMRO, Health Systems ProfileIslamic Republic of Iran, 2006.

Aryankhesal A. The Iranian hospital grading system and its influence on stakeholders’ behavior. PhD

thesis. The University of York, 2010.

Rangrazjedi F, Rabiee R. Patient’s Bill of Rights in Kashan`s hospitals (Iran). Behbood. 2005; 10(1): 62- 71.

Joolaee S, Nikbakht-Nasrabadi, A, Parsa-Yekta, Z, Tschudin V, Mansouri I. An Iranian perspective on

patients' rights. Nurs Ethics. 2006; 13(5): 488-502. PMID: 16961113.

Heyrani A, Maleki M, Marnani AB, Ravaghi H, Sedaghat M, Jabbari M, et al. Clinical governance

implementation in a selected teaching emergency department: a systems approach. Implement Sci. 2012; 7:

PMID: 22963589.

Office of Hospital Management and Clinical Excellence: An introduction to essentials of clinical

governance (in Persian). Tehran, Iran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2011.

Ravaghi H, Mohseni M, Rafiei S, Zadeh NS, Mostofian F, Heidarpoor P. Clinical Governance in Iran:

Theory to Practice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 109, 1174-9. doi:

1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.607.

Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust (SUHT). Patient and Public Involvement Strategy 2011- 2014. Available from: http://www.uhs.nhs.uk/

Maloff B, Bilan D, Thurston W. Enhancing public input into decision making: Development of the Calgary

Regional Health Authority public participation model. Family & Community Health. 2000; 23(1): 66-78.

doi: 10.1097/00003727-200004000-00008

Burns KK, Bellows M, Eigenseher C, Gallivan J. Practical’ resources to support patient and family

engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14(1): 175. doi:

1186/1472-6963-14-175, PMID: 24735787, PMCID: PMC4005635.

Caddy J, Vergez C. Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy- Making. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2001.

Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, Sweeney J. Patient and family

engagement: a model for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health

Affairs. 2013; 32(2): 223-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.

Cleemput I, Christiaens W, Kohn L, Léonard C, Daue F, Denis A. Acceptability and Perceived Benefits

and Risks of Public and Patient Involvement in Health Care Policy: A Delphi Survey in Belgian

Stakeholders. Value in Health. 2015; 18(4): 477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.015.

Whitty JA, Burton P, Kendall E, Ratcliffe J, Wilson A, Littlejohns P, Scuffham PA. Harnessing the

potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens’ juries. Int J Health Policy

Manag. 2014; 3(2): 57-62. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.61, PMID: 25114943, PMCID: PMC4122074.

Christiaens W, Kohn L, Léonard C, Denis A, Daue F, Cleemput I. Models for citizen and patient

involvement in health care policy Part I: exploration of their feasibility and acceptability. Health Services

Research (HSR). Brussels: Belgian Health care Knowledge Centre (KCE). 2012. KCE Reports 195C.

D/2012/10.273/105.

Morgan LM. Community participation in health: perpetual allure, persistent challenge. Health policy plan.

; 16(3): 221-30. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.3.221, PMID: 11527862.

Momeni M. New topics in operations research, first edition, Tehran, Tehran University press, 2006

Boudioni M, McLaren S. Challenges and facilitators for patient and public involvement in England; focus

groups with senior nurses. Open Journal of Nursing, 2013; 3(07): 472. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2013.37064.

Pivik JR. Practical strategies for facilitating meaningful citizen involvement in health planning.

Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada. 2002.

Sykes C, Goodwin W. Assessing patient, carer and public involvement in health care. Quality in Primary

Care. 2007; 15(1): 45-52.

Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin FP, 2003. Deliberations about deliberative

methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social science &

medicine.2003; 57(2): 239-51. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00343-X.

Marzano G, Lubkina V, Skurvydas A. Citizens’ participation in healthcare: a productive opportunity or just

a populist ethic idea? Hygeia. 2013; 48(2): 129-36.

Kapiriri L, Norheim OF, Heggenhougen K. Public participation in health planning and priority setting at

the district level in Uganda. Health policy plan. 2003; 18(2): 205-13. PMID: 12740325. 29) Tritter JQ. Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a

consumerist world. Health Expect. 2009; 12(3): 275-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00564.x, PMID:

Barnes M, Coelho VS. Social participation in health in Brazil and England: inclusion, representation and

authority. Health Expect. 2009; 12(3): 226-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00563.x, PMID: 19754687.

Armstrong N, Herbert G, Aveling EL, Dixon Woods M, Martin G. Optimizing patient involvement in

quality improvement. Health Expect. 2013; 16(3): e36-e47. doi: 10.1111/hex.12039.

Arnstein S. A ladder of citizen participation. American Institute of Planners Journal. 1969; 35: 216-24. doi:

1080/01944366908977225.

Charles CA, DeMaio S. Lay participation in health care decision-making: a conceptual model. J Health

Polit Policy Law. 1993; 18: 881–904. doi: 10.1215/03616878-18-4-881.

International Association for Public Participation: IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation

Kolasa K, Hermanowski T, Borek E. Importance of public participation in decision-making process in

healthcare system illustarted with an example of the development of American and Polish scope of health

benefit basket. Przegl Epidemiol. 2013; 67(4): 661-6, 749-54. PMID: 24741914.

Li KK, Abelson J, Giacomini M, Contandriopoulos D. Conceptualizing the use of public involvement in

health policy decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 138: 14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.023,

PMID: 26043073.

Linhorst DM, Eckert A, Hamilton G, Young E. The involvement of a consumer council in organizational

decision making in a public psychiatric hospital. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001; 28(4): 427-38. PMID:

Wait S, Nolte E. Public involvement policies in health: exploring their conceptual basis. Health Econ

Policy Law. 2006; 1(02): 149-62. doi: 10.1017/S174413310500112X.

Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, et al. Systematic review of involving

patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002; 325(7375): 1263. PMID: 12458240.

Pizzo E, Doyle C, Matthews R, Barlow J. Patient and public involvement: how much do we spend and

what are the benefits? Health Expect. 2015; 18(6): 1918-26. doi: 10.1111/hex.12204, PMID: 12458240.

Thurston WE, MacKean G, Vollman A, Casebeer A, Weber M, Maloff B, et al. Public participation in

regional health policy: a theoretical framework. Health Policy. 2005; 73(3): 237-52. doi:

1016/j.healthpol.2004.11.013, PMID: 16039343.

Ridley J, Jones L. User and public involvement in health services: A literature review. 2005; Partners in

Change [Scottish Human Services Trust].

Published

2022-03-07

Issue

Section

Articles