Socio-Economic Factors Influencing on Total Fertility Rate in Iran
A Panel Data Analysis for the Period of 2002-2012
Keywords:
Total fertility rate, Divorce, Marriage, Urbanization, UnemploymentAbstract
Introduction: Over the last few decades, total fertility rate (TFR) has followed a downward trend in Iran. The consequences of this trend from the perspectives of some are negative. Considering the macro-population policies in recent years, this study aimed to examine the effect of some macro socio-economic variables, including divorce, marriage, urbanization, and unemployment rate on TFR in Iran from 2002 to 2012.
Methods: This time series research was conducted in 2015 using the databases of the National Organization for Civil Registration (NOCR) and the Statistical Center of Iran. The study population was the related data of provinces in the selected variables. The main methods used in the research were the common unit root test, Pedroni Cointegration test, redundant fixed effects tests, correlated random effects-Hausman test, and panel least squares of fixed effects. In order to determine the suitable model for estimating panel data, likelihood ratio and Huasman tests were done using Eviews software, and the fixed effects regression model was chosen as the dominant model.
Results: The results indicated that the divorce rate had a negative and significant effect on TFR (p < 0.05). A positive and significant relationship between marriage rate and TFR variables also was observed (p < 0.05). Urbanization rate (p = 0.24) and unemployment rate (p = 0.36) had no significant relationship with TFR. According to F statistic, significance of the overall model also was confirmed (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Due to the lower effect of the studied factors on the reduction of TFR, it seems that variables other than the ones studied, as well as cultural factors and values, might be fundamental factors for this change in the country.
References
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Babies and Bosses: Reconciling
Work and Family Life. Australia, Denmark and the Netherlands. OECD Report. 2002; 1: 1. doi:
1787/9789264104204.
Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education. Ten-year report of the Islamic Republic of Iran on
the goals of the International Conference on Population and Development, Tehran, Iran, 2004.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Fertility rates (indicator), OECD
Report, 2015. Available from: https://data.oecd.org/pop/fertility-rates.htm. doi: 10.1787/20747721.
United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision, UN Report, New York. Available from:
http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2006/wpp2006.htm. doi: 10.18356/02911.
Shapiro D, Kreider A, Varner C, Sinha M. Stalling of Fertility Transitions and Socioeconomic Change in
the Developing World: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys. Department of Economics
Pennsylvania State University Park. 2011: 1-15.
Shapiro D, Gebreselassie T. Fertility Transition in Sub-Saharan Africa: Falling and Stalling, Afr. Popul
Stud. 2008; 23(1): 3-23. doi: 10.11564/23-1-310.
Statistical Center of Iran. Indicators of population in Iran, 2012. Available from:
https://www.amar.org.ir/Default.aspx.
Demographic and Health Survey. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education, 2002.
Abbasi Shavazi MJ, McDonald P, Hosseini Chavoshi M. The fertility transition in Iran. Revolution and
Reproduction. 2009; 75. ISBN: 978-90-481-3197-6.
Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution (SCCR). National programs to promote population growth and
fertility rates. Tehran: Center for Women's Affairs and Family, 2013.
Erfani A. Fertility in Tehran city and Iran: rates, trends and differentials. Population studies journal. 2013;
Adsera A. Changing fertility rates in developed markets. The impact of labour market institutions. J Popul
Econ. 2004; 17: 17-43. doi: 10.1007/s00148-003-0166.
Mills M, Blossfeld HP, Klijzing E. Becoming an adult in uncertain times: A 14-country comparison of the
losers of globalization. Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. Routledge. 2005; 393–411. doi:
1177/0038038507084834.
Caldwell, John C. Theory of Fertility Decline. Academic Press. 1982. doi: 10.2307/351322.
Blacker J, Opiyo C, Jasseh M, Sloggett a, Ssekamatte Ssebuliba J. Fertility in Kenya and Uganda: A
Comparative Study of Trends and Determinants. Popul Stud. 2005; 59(3): 355-73. doi:
1080/00324720500281672.
Kreyenfeld M. Uncertainties in female employment careers and the postponement of parenthood in
Germany. EurSoc Rev. 2010; 26: 351–66. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp026.
Shakoori R. Divorce and its developments in Iran: 1986-2006, a case study in Qom, master's thesis.
University of AllamehTabatabai. 2011.
Notestein F. Economic problems of population change, in Proceedings of the International Conference of
Agricultural Economists. Oxford University Press. 1953; 13-31. doi: 10.2307/40197878.
Abbasi Shavazi MJ, Asgari Nodoushan A. Family changes and reduced fertility in Iran, a case study in
Yazd province. a social science. 2005; 25: 25-75.
Abdul Salam A. Nuptiality and fertility in Saudi Arabia: An appraisal of census data. Middle East Fertil
Soc J. 2013; 18(13): 147–53. doi: 10.1016/j.mefs.2013.04.006.
Bongaarts J. The end of the fertility transition in the developing world, Working Paper, Population Council.
Popul Dev Rev. 2002; 28(3): 419-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00419.
Abbasi Shavazi MJ, Hosseini Chavoshi M. Fertility developments in Iran in the past four decades: using
and evaluating their children fertility estimates using 1986-2011. the Institute for Statistics. 2013.
Hu J, Liu F, You J. Panel data partially linear model with fixed effects, spatial autoregressive error
components and unspecified intertemporal correlation. J Multivar Ana. 2014; 130: 64–89. doi:
1016/j.jmva.2014.05.002.
Kazemipour Sh, Khoshnevis A. Meta-Analysis of studies on levels, trends and determinants of divorce in
Iran and selected countries 1970-2011. Population Studies Journal. 2013; 33-59.
Lee YJ, BumPass L. Socio economic determinants of divorce/separation in South Korea: A focus on wife’s
current and desired employment characteristics. Development and Society. 2008; 37(2).
Razeghi Nasrabad HB. A survey on factors affecting fertility of married woman aged 35-44 in selected
provinces. population Studies Journal. 2013; 109-28.
Abbasi Shavazi MJ. Recent changes and the future of fertility in Iran, paper presented at the Expert Group
Meeting on Continuing Fertility Transition. Population Division of the United Nations. 2002; 13-8.
Ranjbar F, Shirzad M, Kamali K, Akhondi MM, Ghoodjani A, Behjati Ardakani Z, et al. Fertility behaviour
of Iranian women: A community-based, cross-sectional study. Arch Iran Med. 2015; 18(1): 2-5. doi:
/AIM.003. PMID: 25556378.
Addio D, Ercole M. Policies, institutions and fertility rates: A panel data analysis for OECD countries.
OECD Econ Stud. 2005; 41. doi: 10.1787/16097491.
Gauthier AH, Hatzius J. Family benefits and fertility: An econometric analysis. Popul Stud. 1997; 51(3):
-306. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000150066.
Billari F, Kohler HP. Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe. Popul Stud. 2004; 58(2): 161-76.
doi: 10.1080/0032472042000213695.
Brewster KL, Rindfuss RR. Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized nations. Annu Rev So.
; 26(1): 271-96. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.271.
Kogel T. Did the association between fertility and female employment within OECD countries really
change its signs? J Popul Econ. 2004; 17(1): 45–65. doi: 10.1007/s00148-003-0180.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 KNOWLEDGE KINGDOM PUBLISHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
