The Efficacy of Contingency Management on Cocaine Craving, using Prize-based Reinforcement of Abstinence in Cocaine Users

Authors

  • Bijan Pirnia PhD. Student of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Behavioral therapy, Token economy, Craving, Psychotherapy, Contingency Management (CM)

Abstract

Introduction: Contingency management (CM) is one of the most common therapies in the domain of drug addiction. This study has been carried out with the purpose of evaluating the efficacy of contingency management intervention. 

Method: In an experimental design, between December 15, 2014 and November 20, 2015, fifty men (between 18 and 31 with an average age of 24.6) with a history of cocaine use, were selected voluntarily and were randomly assigned into two groups of CM and control group. The CM group were awarded coupons for negative urine tests, over a period of twelve weeks. The urine tests were taken from the participants twice per week, with cutoff concentrations for positive set at 300 ng/ml and self-reporting index of cocaine craving (response rate = 96%) were evaluated in two phase, through pretest and posttest measures. The data were analyzed by parametric covariance test. Additionally, the qualitative data, resulted from demographic measures, were coded and were analyzed with the help of an analysis instrument of qualitative data i.e. ATLAS.ti-5.2. 

Results: The primary outcome was the number of negative urine tests and the secondary outcome included the cocaine usage craving index over twelve weeks. The mean of (95% of confidence) number of negative cocaine urine tests was 15.4 (13.1–17.8) in the CM group and 19.7 (17.7–21.6) in the control group (P = 0.049). Also, results showed that CM has a significant effect on reducing craving (p<0.01). 

Conclusion: The findings of this study, while having practical aspects in this domain, can be valuable in planning remedial procedures.

 

References

Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, Foerg FE, Donham R, Badger GJ. Incentives improve outcome in

outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994; 51(7): 568-76. doi:

1001/archpsyc.1994. PMID: 8031230.

Griffith JD, Rowan-Szal GA, Roark RR, Simpson DD. Contingency management in outpatient methadone

treatment: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000; 58(1): 55-66. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00068- x. PMID: 10669055.

Petry NM, Martin B, Cooney JL, Kranzler HR. Give them prizes and they will come: Contingency

management for treatment of alcohol dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000; 68(2): 250-7. PMID:

Schepis TS, Duhig AM, Liss T, Mc Fetridge A, Wu R, Cavallo DA, et al. Contingency management for

smoking cessation: Enhancing feasibility through use of immunoassay test strips measuring cotinine.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2008; 10(9): 1495-501. doi: 10.1080/14622200802323209. PMID: 19023841, PMCID:

PMC3679884.

Volpp KG, John LK, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender J, Loewenstein G. Financial incentive–based

approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008; 300(22): 2631-7. doi:

1001/jama.2008.804. PMID: 19066383, PMCID: PMC3583583.

Volpp KG, Loewenstein G, Troxel AB, Doshi J, Price M, Laskin M, et al. A test of financial incentives to

improve warfarin adherence. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8: 272. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-272. PMID:

, PMCID: PMC2635367.

Volpp KG, Troxel AB, Pauly MV, Glick HA, Puig A, Asch DA, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of

financial incentives for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(7): 699-709. doi:

1056/NEJMsa0806819. PMID: 19213683.

Petry NM, Tedford J, Martin B. Reinforcing compliance with non-drug–related activities. J Subst Abuse

Treat. 2001; 20(1): 33-44. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(00)00143-4. PMID: 11239726.

Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta ‐analysis of voucher‐based

reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction. 2006; 101(2): 192-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1360- 0443. PMID: 16445548.

Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, Greenwell L, Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of

substance use disorders: A meta‐analysis. Addiction. 2006; 101(11): 1546-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1360- 0443.2006.01581.x. PMID: 17034434.

Stitzer ML, Vandrey R. Contingency management: utility in the treatment of drug abuse disorders. Clin

Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 83(4): 644-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100508. PMID: 18305456.

Peirce JM, Petry NM, Stitzer ML, Blaine J, Kellogg S, Satterfield F, et al. Effects of lower-cost incentives

on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: A National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical

Trials Network study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006; 63(2): 201-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.201. PMID:

Carroll KM, Ball SA, Nich C, O'Connor PG, Eagan DA, Frankforter TL, et al. Targeting behavioral

therapies to enhance naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence: efficacy of contingency management and

significant other involvement. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001; 58(8): 755-61. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.8.755.

PMID: 11483141, PMCID: PMC3651594.

Carroll KM, Sinha R, Nich C, Babuscio T, Rounsaville BJ. Contingency management to enhance

naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial of reinforcement magnitude. Exp

Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002; 10(1): 54-63. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.10.1.54. PMID: 11866252.

Preston KL, Silverman K, Umbricht A, DeJesus A, Montoya ID, Schuster CR. Improvement in naltrexone

treatment compliance with contingency management. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999; 54(2): 127-35. doi:

1016/s0376-8716(98)00152-5. PMID: 10217552.

Marlatt GA. Integrating contingency management with relapse prevention skills: comment on Silverman et

al. (2001). Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001; 9(1): 33-4. discussion 35-9. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.9.1.33.

PMID: 11519633.

Silverman K, Svikis D, Wong CJ, Hampton J, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE. A reinforcement-based therapeutic

workplace for the treatment of drug abuse: three-year abstinence outcomes. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol.

; 10(3): 228-40. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.10.3.228. PMID: 12233983.

Corby EA, Roll JM, Ledgerwood DM, Schuster CR. Contingency management interventions for treating

the substance abuse of adolescents: a feasibility study. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000; 8(3): 371-6. doi:

1037/1064-1297.8.3.371. PMID: 10975628.

Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE, Liebson I. Reducing benzodiazepine self-administration with contingent

reinforcement. Addict Behav. 1979; 4(3): 245-52. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(79)90034-0. PMID: 495248.

Stitzer ML, Rand CS, Bigelow GE, Mead AM. Contingent payment procedures for smoking reduction and

cessation. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986; 19(2): 197-202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-197. PMID: 3733589,

PMCID: PMC1308058.

Higgins ST, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE, Liebson IA. Contingent methadone delivery: Effects on illicit-opiate

use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1986; 17(4): 311-22. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(86)90080-3. PMID: 3757767.

Robles E, Stitzer ML, Strain EC, Bigelow GE, Silverman K. Voucher-based reinforcement of opiate

abstinence during methadone detoxification. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002; 65(2): 179-89. doi:

1016/s0376-8716(01)00160-0. PMID: 11772479.

Budney AJ, Higgins ST, Radonovich KJ, Novy PL. Adding voucher-based incentives to coping skills and

motivational enhancement improves outcomes during treatment for marijuana dependence. J Consult Clin

Psychol. 2000; 68(6): 1051-61. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.68.6.1051. PMID: 11142539.

Sigmon SC, Steingard S, Badger GJ, Anthony SL, Higgins ST. Contingent reinforcement of marijuana

abstinence among individuals with serious mental illness: A feasibility study. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol.

; 8(4): 509-17. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.8.4.509. PMID: 11127422.

Rawson RA, Gonzales R, Brethen P. Treatment of methamphetamine use disorders: an update. J Subst

Abuse Treat. 2002; 23(2): 145-50. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00256-8. PMID: 12220612.

Roll JM, Petry NM, Stitzer ML, Brecht ML, Peirce JM, McCann MJ, et al. Contingency management for

the treatment of methamphetamine use disorders. Am J Psychiatr. 2006; 163(11): 1993-9. doi:

1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1993. PMID: 17074952.

Strona FV, McCright J, Hjord H, Ahrens K, Tierney S, Shoptaw S, et al. The acceptability and feasibility of

the Positive Reinforcement Opportunity Project, a community-based contingency management

methamphetamine treatment program for gay and bisexual men in San Francisco. J Psychoactive Drugs.

; 3: 377-83. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1993. PMID: 17357529.

Shoptaw S, Klausner JD, Reback CJ, Tierney S, Stansell J, Hare CB, et al. A public health response to the

methamphetamine epidemic: the implementation of contingency management to treat methamphetamine

dependence. BMC public health. 2006; 6: 2014. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-214. PMID: 16919170,

PMCID: PMC1559698.

Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal

inference: Wadsworth Cengage learning. Wadsworth Publishing. 2002; 76(3): 510-4. doi: 10.1086/345281.

First M, Spitzer R, Gibbon M, Williams J. Biometrics Research. New York State Psychiatric Institute; New

York: 2002. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient

Edition. Clinical Trials Version (SCID-CT). 1995; 9(2): 92-104. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1995.9.2.92.

Sharifi V, Assadi SM, Mohammadi MR, Amini H, Kaviani H, Semnani Y, et al. A persian translation of

the structured clinical interview for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: psychometric

properties. Compr Psychiatry. 2009; 50(1): 86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.04.004. PMID:

Tiffany ST, Singleton E, Haertzen CA, Henningfield JE. The development of a cocaine craving

questionnaire. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993; 34(1): 19-28. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(93)90042-o. PMID:

Sussner BD, Smelson DA, Rodrigues S, Kline A, Losonczy M, Ziedonis D. The validity and reliability of a

brief measure of cocaine craving. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006; 83(3): 233-7. doi:

1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.11.022. PMID: 16384655.

Preston KL, Ghitza UE, Schmittner JP, Schroeder JR, Epstein DH. Randomized trial comparing two

treatment strategies using prize-based reinforcement of abstinence in cocaine and opiate users. J Appl

Behav Anal. 2008; 41(4): 551-63. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-551. PMID: 19192859, PMCID:

PMC2606600.

Kirby KC, Carpenedo CM, Dugosh KL, Rosenwasser BJ, Benishek LA, Janik A, et al. Randomized clinical

trial examining duration of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for cocaine abstinence. Drug Alcohol

Depend. 2013; 132(3): 639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.015. PMID: 23680075, PMCID:

PMC3770760.

Sindelar JL, Olmstead TA, Peirce JM. Cost-effectiveness of prize-based contingency management in

methadone maintenance treatment programs. Addiction. 2007; 102(9): 1463-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1360- 0443.2007.01913.x. PMID: 17645428, PMCID: PMC3072844.

Festinger DS, Dugosh KL, Kirby KC, Seymour BL. Contingency management for cocaine treatment: Cash

vs. vouchers. JSAT. 2014; 47(2): 168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat. PMID: 24746956, PMCID: PMC4504189.

Heil SH, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. Alcohol dependence among cocaine-dependent outpatients:

demographics, drug use, treatment outcome and other characteristics. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2001; 62(1):

-22. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.14. PMID: 11271960.

Rash CJ, Alessi SM, Petry NM. Cocaine abusers with and without alcohol dependence respond equally

well to contingency management treatments. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008; 16(4): 275-81. doi:

1037/a0012787. PMID: 18729681, PMCID: PMC2730966.

Killeen TK, McRae-Clark AL, Waldrop AE, Upadhyaya H, Brady KT. Contingency Management in

Community Programs Treating Adolescent Substance Abuse: A Feasibility Study. J Child Adolesc

Psychiatr Nurs. 2012; 25(1): 33-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2011.00313.x. PMID: 22299805, PMCID:

PMC3322112.

Murphy SM, McDonell MG, McPherson S, Srebnik D, Angelo F, Roll JM, et al. An economic evaluation

of a contingency-management intervention for stimulant use among community mental health patients with

serious mental illness. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015; 153: 293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.004.

PMID: 26026494, PMCID: PMC4509830.

Festinger DS, Dugosh KL, Kirby KC, Seymour BL. Contingency management for cocaine treatment: Cash

vs. vouchers. JSAT. 2014; 47(2): 168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat. PMID: 24746956, PMCID: PMC4504189.

Published

2022-03-08