Comparing the effect of volar plate fixators and external fixators on outcome of patients with intra-articular distal radius fractures

A clinical trial

Authors

  • Mohammadreza Safdari Orthopedic Surgeon, Bojnourd University of Medical Sciences, Imam Ali Hospital, Bojnourd, Iran

Keywords:

Distal radius fracture, External fixator method, Internal fixation

Abstract

Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are much more prone to malunion than unstable extra-articular fractures. There is no clear consensus concerning what the proper treatment should be, and the best approach to use for displaced DRFs remains challenging.  

Objective: To compare the effect of two different therapeutic surgical methods, i.e., volar plate fixators and external fixators, on outcomes of patients with intra-articular distal radius fractures.

Methods: From May 2010 to November 2014, 76 subjects who had experienced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in Imam Ali Hospital in Bojnourd, Iran. The patients were divided into two groups, i.e., 1) patients who were treated with internal fixation using the volar plate (group A) and 2) patients who were treated with external fixators (group B). The primary outcome was a composite measure of the patient’s quality of life using three different scores, i.e., 1) the MAYO score, 2) Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH (score,  and 3) the Short Form (36) (SF-36) Health Survey score. 

Results: A total of 76 patients were allocated randomly to groups A and B. The mean ages for external fixator cases and volar plate cases were 51.7 and 46.3, respectively. No significant age distribution was seen between the two groups (p=0.348). Gender distribution between the two groups was not significantly different (p=0.022). Grip power was significantly different between the two groups, but no significant differences were detected in range of motion (p=0.008, p=0.367, respectively). The MAYO score was significantly higher in the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) group, and, according to the SF-36 test, the ORIF group also a higher level of general mental and physical health, social functioning, and personal physical functioning than the other group. However, postoperatively, the mental discomfort and physical discomfort were more prevalent in the external fixator group. The DASH score was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.124).

Conclusions: ORIF and its subtitle, volar plate fixation, is a more preferred surgical procedure than the external fixator for the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures. This conclusion is important when one considers cost-effectiveness and an earlier return to work. 

Trial registration: The trial is registered at the Thai Clinical Trial Registry (clinicaltrials.in.th) with the TCR identification number TCTR20150609002

Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Cooney W, Linscheid R, Dobyns J. External pin fixation for unstable Colles’ fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am.

; 61(6A): 840-5. PMID: 479230

Arora R, Lutz M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Haug L, Gabl M. A prospective randomized trial comparing

nonoperative treatment with volar locking plate fixation for displaced and unstable distal radial fractures in

patients sixty-five years of age and older. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(23):2146-53. doi:

2106/JBJS.J.01597. PMID: 22159849

Arora R1, Gabl M, Erhart S, Schmidle G, Dallapozza C, Lutz M. Aspects of current management of distal

radius fractures in the elderly individuals. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2011; 2(5-6):187-94. doi:

1177/2151458511426874. PMID: 23569689

Plate JF, Gaffney DL, Emory CL, Mannava S, Smith BP, Koman LA, et al. Randomized comparison of volar

locking plates and intramedullary nails for unstable distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40 (6):1095- 101. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.02.014. PMID: 25840480

Xia S, Lu Y, Wang H, Wu Z, Wang Z. Open reduction and internal fixation with conventional plate via L- shaped lateral approach versus internal fixation with percutaneous plate via a sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal

fractures - a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2014; 12(5): 475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.03.001.

PMID: 24607889

Osada D, Kamei S, Masuzaki K, Takai M, Kameda M, Tamai K. Prospective study of distal radius fractures

treated with a volar locking plate system. J Hand Surg Am. 2008; 33 (5):691-700. doi:

1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.024. PMID: 18590852

Noble P, Marshall A, Barron O, Catalano L. Malpractice in distal radius fracture management: an analysis of

closed claims. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39(8):1480-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.02.019. PMID: 24785702

Chung K, Shauver M, Birkmeyer J. Trends in the United States in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the

elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(8):1868-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01297. PMID: 19651943

Leung F, Tu Y, Chew W, Chow S. Comparison of external and percutaneous pin fixation with plate fixation for

intra-articular distal radial fractures. A randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(1):16-22. doi:

2106/JBJS.F.01581. PMID: 18171953

Valdes K, Naughton N, Burke C. Therapist-supervised hand therapy versus home therapy with therapist

instruction following distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40(6):1110-16. doi:

1016/j.jhsa.2015.01.036. PMID: 25817323

Brehmer J, Husband J. Accelerated rehabilitation compared with a standard protocol after distal radial fractures

treated with volar open reduction and internal fixation: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone

Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(19):1621-30. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00860. PMID: 25274787

Gradl G, Mielsch N, Wendt M, Falk S, Mittlmeier T, Gierer P,et al. Intramedullary nail versus volar plate

fixation of extra-articular distal radius fractures. Two year results of a prospective randomized trial. Injury.

; 45 Suppl 1:S3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.045. PMID: 24268189

Goehre F, Otto W, Schwan S, Mendel T, Vergroesen P, Lindemann L. Comparison of palmar fixed-angle plate

fixation with K-wire fixation of distal radius fractures (AO A2, A3, C1) in elderly patients. J Hand Surg Eur

Vol. 2014; 39(3):249-57. doi: 10.1177/1753193413489057. PMID: 23677960

Arora R, Lutz M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Haug L, Gabl M. A prospective randomized trial comparing

nonoperative treatment with volar locking plate fixation for displaced and unstable distal radial fractures in

patients sixty-five years of age and older. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(23):2146-53. doi:

2106/JBJS.J.01597. PMID: 22159849

Fadyen I, Field J, McCann P, Ward J, Nicol S, Curwen C. Should unstable extra-articular distal radial fractures

be treated with fixed-angle volar-locked plates or percutaneous Kirschner wires? A prospective randomised

controlled trial. Injury. 2011; 42(2):162-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.07.236. PMID: 20691441

Zettl R, Clauberg E, Nast-Kolb D, Ruchholtz S, Kühne C. Volar locking compression plating versus dorsal

plating for fractures of the distal radius: a prospective, randomized study. Unfallchirurg. 2009; 112(8):712-8.

doi: 10.1007/s00113-008-1526-5. PMID: 19597773

Wei D, Raizman N, Bottino C, Jobin C, Strauch R, Rosenwasser M. Unstable distal radial fractures treated with

external fixation, a radial column plate, or a volar plate. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am.

; 91 (7):1568-77. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00722. PMID: 19571078.

Published

2022-03-08