Effects of box size, frequency of lifting, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift and heart rate for male university students in Iran
Keywords:
MMH, MAWL, heart rate, psychophysical methodologyAbstract
Introduction: In spite of the widespread use of automation in industry, manual material handling (MMH) is still performed in many occupational settings. The emphasis on ergonomics in MMH tasks is due to the potential risks of workplace accidents and injuries. This study aimed to assess the effect of box size, frequency of lift, and height of lift on maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) on the heart rates of male university students in Iran.
Methods: This experimental study was conducted in 2015 with 15 male students recruited from Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Each participant performed 18 different lifting tasks that involved three lifting frequencies (1lift/min, 4.3 lifts/min and 6.67 lifts/min), three lifting heights (floor to knuckle, knuckle to shoulder, and shoulder to arm reach), and two box sizes. Each set of experiments was conducted during the 20 min work period using the free-style lifting technique. The working heart rates (WHR) were recorded for the entire duration. In this study, we used SPSS version 18 software and descriptive statistical methods, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the t-test for data analysis.
Results: The results of the ANOVA showed that there was a significant difference between the mean of MAWL in terms of frequencies of lifts (p = 0.02). Tukey's post hoc test indicated that there was a significant difference between the frequencies of 1 lift/minute and 6.67 lifts/minute (p = 0. 01). There was a significant difference between the mean heart rates in terms of frequencies of lifts (p = 0.006), and Tukey's post hoc test indicated a significant difference between the frequencies of 1 lift/minute and 6.67 lifts/minute (p = 0.004). But, there was no significant difference between the mean of MAWL and the mean heart rate in terms of lifting heights (p > 0.05). The results of the t-test showed that there was a significant difference between the mean of MAWL and the mean heart rate in terms of the sizes of the two boxes (p = 0.000).
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that MAWL and heart rate are influenced by the variables of lifting frequency and the size of the boxes.
References
Hoonyong Yoon et al. Psychophysical and physiological study of one-handed and two-handed combined
tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics.1999; 24, 49-60. Doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141
(98)00087-0
Ayoub M.M., Selan J.J., Jiang B. C., Manual Materials Handling in Handbook of Human Factors
Engineering Ed. Salvendy Gavriel, Chischester, New York, John Wiley, 1987. doi:
1002/0470048204.ch30.
Vincent M. Ciriello et all. 1999. Approaches to the control of back pain in industry: Job design, job
placement, and education/training. Spine: State of the Art Reviews 2, 45-59. PMID: 2963391
Ciriello VM, Snook SH, Hashemi L, Cotnam J. Distributions of manual materials handling task parameters.
Int J Ind Ergon. 1999; 24 (4): 379-88. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00005-0.
Snook, S.H., Ciriello, V.M.The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable
weights and forces. Ergonomics. 1991; 34 (9): 1197-213. doi: 10.1080/00140139108964855, PMID:
Snook SH. The design of manual handling tasks. Ergonomics. 1978; 21 (12): 963-85. doi:
1080/00140137808931804, PMID: 729559
Snook SH. Psychophysical considerations in permissible loads. Ergonomics. 1985; 28 (1): 327-30. doi:
1080/00140138508963140, PMID: 3158515
Boocock MG, Monnington SC, Pinder ADJ. Balance of Risk between Weight of Load and Frequency of
Lift: A Study of the Psychophysical and Biomechanical Parameters of Repetitive Handling. HSL Report
EWP/98/01. 1998.
Pinder AD, Health, Safety Executive SH, Lab. S. Literature review: The relationship between load and
frequency in manual handling operations: Health and Safety Laboratories; 1998.
Wu S-P. Psychophysically determined symmetric and asymmetric lifting capacity of Chinese males for one
hour's work shifts. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000; 25 (6): 675-82. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00055-4.
Wu S-P, Chen J-P. Effects of the adjustment period on psychophysically determined maximum acceptable
weight of lift and the physiological cost. Int J Ind Ergon. 2003; 31 (5): 287-94. doi: 10.1016/S0169- 8141(02)00218-4.
Lee T-H. Psychophysically determined asymmetrical lifting capabilities for different frequencies and
containers. Ind Health. 2005; 43 (2): 337-40. PMID: 15895850.
Lee T-H. Maximum symmetric and asymmetric isoinertial lifting capabilities from floor to knuckle height.
Ind Health. 2009; 47 (6): 635-9. PMID: 19996539.
Lee T-H, Cheng T-S. Asymmetric lifting capabilities for different container dimensions. Int J Occup Saf
Ergon. 2011; 17 (2): 187-93. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2011.11076878, PMID: 21679670.
Ciriello VM. The effects of box size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable
weights of lifting. Int J Ind Ergon. 2003; 32 (2): 115-20. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(03)00045-3.
Ciriello VM. Psychophysically determined horizontal and vertical forces of dynamic pushing on high and
low coefficient of friction floors for female industrial workers. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005; 2 (3): 136-42.
doi: 10.1080/15459620590917034, PMID: 15764537.
Ciriello VM. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum
acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers. Appl Ergon. 2007; 38 (1): 1-5. PMID:
Maiti R, Ray G. Determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift by adult Indian female workers. Int J
Ind Ergon. 2004; 34 (6): 483-95. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2004.06.003.
Singh J, Kalra P, Walia R, editors. Study of Maximum Acceptable Weight of Lift for Indian Male
Industrial Workers. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology; 2012; 1 (9), 2181- 2278.
Ciriello VM, Snook SH. A study of size, distance, height, and frequency effects on manual handling tasks.
Hum Factors. 1983; 25 (5): 473-83. doi: 10.1177/001872088302500502, PMID: 6667937.
Karwowski W, Yates J. Reliability of the psychophysical approach to manual lifting of liquids by females.
Ergonomics. 1986; 29 (2): 237-48. doi: 10.1080/00140138608968262, PMID: 3956474.
Snook SH, Vaillancourt DR, Ciriello VM, Webster BS. Psychophysical studies of repetitive wrist flexion
and extension. Ergonomics. 1995; 38 (7): 1488-507. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925204, PMID:7635136.
Mital A. Prediction of maximum weights of lift acceptable to male and female industrial workers. Journal
of Occupational Accidents. 1984; 5 (4): 223-31. doi: 10.1016/0376-6349(84)90001-4.
Mital A. Maximum weights of lift acceptable to male and female industrial workers for extended work
shifts. Ergonomics. 1984; 27 (11): 1115-26. doi: 10.1080/00140138408963594, PMID: 6519051.
Mital A, Aghazadeh F. Psychophysical lifting capabilities for overreach heights. Ergonomics. 1987; 30 (6):
-9. doi: 10.1080/00140138708969786, PMID: 3622472.
Wright UR, Mital A. Maximum Weights of Handling Acceptable to People Aged 55–74 Years: Part I.
Lifting. J Occup Rehabil. 1999; 9 (1): 3-13.doi: 10.1023/A:1021385230426.
Ciriello VM, Snook SH, Hughes GJ. Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable
weights and forces. Hum Factors.1993; 35 (1): 175-86. doi: 10.1177/001872089303500110, PMID:
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 KNOWLEDGE KINGDOM PUBLISHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
