Problematic use of short message service (SMS) in medical students and its possible association with personality dimensions

Authors

  • Maliheh Dadgarmoghaddam MD, Assistant Professor of Community Medicine, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of medical sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Keywords:

Personality assessment, Temperament, Character, Text messaging, Addictive behavior

Abstract

Background: The use of short message service (SMS) is very popular among youths. Recent research has shown that it has some adverse consequences such as dependency.  Objective: The present research aimed to determine the frequency of SMS dependency and its association with the temperament and character of medical students. Methods: A total of 293 medical students participated in this cross-sectional study in 2015 in Mashhad, Iran. The study group was divided into four groups according to their grade (using stratified sampling). Temperament and character inventory (TCI) and an SMS addiction test (SAT) were distributed between participants. SPSS software (version 11.5) was used for data analysis. Linear regression, Spearman's Rank-Order Correlation, Independent-samples t-test, ANOVA, Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskal Wallis were used for data analysis. P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Result: The mean age of participants was 24.44±4.63. Novelty seeking (p=0.003), cooperativeness (p<0.001), self-directedness (p<0.001) and self-transcendence (p=0.003) showed significant inverse correlation with total SAT score. There was significant difference between the mean of the total SAT in three state variables of novelty seeking (p=0.02), cooperativeness (p<0.001), self-directedness (p<0.001) and self-transcendence (p=0.02). The residents group had the highest mean SAT score. There was a significant difference in the total SAT scores according to the grade of the student (p<0.001). Moreover, we compared the participants’ temperament and character with Iranian normative data (derived from a study conducted in 2005) and found that the mean score in each area differed significantly between the two datasets (p≤0.001). Conclusion: Use of communication technologies is different according to temperament. Considering the key role of medical students, more attention needs to be paid to cellphone usage in this group.

References

Hassanzadeh R, Rezaei A. Effect of sex, course and age on SMS addiction in students. Middle-East Journal

of Scientific Research. 2011; 10(5): 619-25.

Lopez-Fernandez O, Männikkö N, Kääriäinen M, Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ. Mobile gaming and problematic

smartphone use: A comparative study between Belgium and Finland. Journal of behavioral addictions.

; 7(1): 88-99. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.080. PMID: 29313732, PMCID: PMC6035026.

Beydokhti A, Hassanzadeh R, Mirzaian B. The relationship between five main factors of personality and

addiction to SMS in high school students. Current Research Journal of Biological Sciences. 2012; 4(6):

-9.

Hoffner CA, Lee S, Park SJ. “I miss my mobile phone!”: Self-expansion via mobile phone and responses to

phone loss. New Media & Society. 2016; 18(11): 2452-68. doi: 10.1177/1461444815592665.

Lepp A, Barkley JE, Karpinski AC. The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance,

anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014; 31: 343-50.

doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049.

Golmohammadian M, Yaseminejad P. Normalization, validity and reliability of Cell-phone Over-use Scale

(COS) among university students. 2011.

Madell DE, Muncer SJ. Control over social interactions: an important reason for young people's use of the

Internet and mobile phones for communication? Cyberpsychol behav. 2007; 10(1): 137-40. doi:

1089/cpb.2006.9980. PMID: 17305461.

Hesam AA, Safari Moradabadi A, Avazpoor N, Ghanbarnejad A. Investigating demographic variables

associated with text messaging addiction among students of Medical Sciences in Hormozgan University

During 2013. Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture. 2013.

Igarashi T, Motoyoshi T, Takai J, Yoshida T. No mobile, no life: Self-perception and text-message

dependency among Japanese high school students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2008; 24(5): 2311-24.

doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.12.001.

Zokaei M, Taj Mazinani A, Karimi A. SMS role in youth life. Journal of Sociological Studies of Youth.

; 5(14): 43-66.

Karadağ E, Tosuntaş ŞB, Erzen E, Duru P, Bostan N, Şahin BM, et al. Determinants of phubbing, which is

the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2015;

(2): 60-74. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.005. PMID: 26014669, PMCID: PMC4500886.

Holohan M. Does your partner love his cellphone more than you? Take this survey 2015.

Suleiman Al-Barashdi H, Bouazza A, Jabur NH. Smartphone addiction among university undergraduates: a

literature review. 2015.

Višnjić A, Veličković V, Sokolović D, Stanković M, Mijatović K, Stojanović M, et al. Relationship

between the manner of mobile phone use and depression, anxiety, and stress in university students.

International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018; 15(4): 697. doi:

3390/ijerph15040697. PMID: 29642471, PMCID: PMC5923739.

Javid M, Malik MA, Gujjar AA. Mobile Phone Culture and its Psychological Impacts on Students'

Learning at the University Level. Language In India. 2011; 11(2).

Rodrigues A. The perceived impacts of smartphone use on the performance of senior managers in South

African firms. Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town Retrieved August. 2011; 31: 2014.

Jacobsen WC, Forste R. The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use

among university students. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011; 14(5): 275-80. doi:

1089/cyber.2010.0135. PMID: 20961220.

Lu X, Chen Z, Uji M, Nagata T, Katoh T, Kitamura T. Use of mobile phone text message and personality

among Japanese university students. Psychology Behavioral Sci. 2013; 2: 192-5. doi:

11648/j.pbs.20130205.14.

Kaviani H, Hagshenas H. Preliminary study of adaptation and standardization temperament and character

inventory (TCI). Adv Cogn Sci. 2000; 2(3-4): 18-24. 20) Kaviani H. Normative data on Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): complimentary findings.

Tehran University Medical Journal. 2009; 67(4).

Kaviani H, Pornaseh M. Standardization temperament and character inventory (TCI) on Iranian crowds.

Tehran Uni Med J. 2005; 63(2): 89-98.

Igarashi T, Motoyoshi T, Takai J, Yoshida T, editors. The text messaging addiction scale: Factor structure,

reliability, and validity. Sixth biennial conference of the Asian Association of Social Psychology,

Wellington, New Zealand; 2005.

Geser H. Are girls (even) more addicted? Some gender patterns of cell phone usage. SSOAR. 2006.

Bianchi A, Phillips JG. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychol Behav. 2005;

(1): 39-51. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39. PMID: 15738692.

Chóliz M. Mobile-phone addiction in adolescence: the test of mobile phone dependence (TMD). Prog

Health Sci. 2012; 2(1): 33-44.

Kawasaki N, Tanei S, Ogata F, Burapadaja S, Loetkham C, Nakamura T, et al. Survey on cellular phone

usage on students in Thailand. Journal of Physiological Anthropology. 2006; 25(6): 377-82. doi:

2114/jpa2.25.377. PMID: 17213690.

Leung L. Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among

adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of children and media. 2008; 2(2): 93-113. doi:

1080/17482790802078565.

Pawłowska B, Potembska E. Gender and severity of symptoms of mobile phone addiction in Polish

gymnasium, secondary school and university students. Current Problems of Psychiatry. 2011; 12(4).

Wilska TA. Mobile phone use as part of young people's consumption styles. Journal of consumer policy.

; 26(4): 441-63. doi: 10.1023/A:1026331016172.

Igarashi T, Takai J, Yoshida T. Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text

messages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2005; 22(5): 691-713. doi:

1177/0265407505056492.

Pawlowska B, Potembska E. Gender and severity of symptoms of mobile phone addiction in Polish

gymnasium, secondary school and university students. Current Problems of Psychiatry. 2011; 12(4): 433-8.

Arumugam B, Sachi S, Nagalingam S. A Descriptive Study On Behavior Associated With Mobile Phone

Usage And Its Effect On Health Among Medical Students In Chennai. Journal of Evolution of Medical and

Dental Sciences. 2014; 3(7): 1590-95. doi: 10.14260/jemds/2014/2029.

Singh B, Gupta R, Garg R. Mobile Phones; A Boon or Bane for Mankind?-Behavior of Medical Students.

International Journal of Innovative Research and Development. 2013; 2(4): 196-205.

Krajewska-Kułak E, Kułak W, Stryzhak A, Szpakow A, Prokopowicz W, Marcinkowski J. Problematic

mobile phone using among the Polish and Belarusian University students, a comparative study. Prog Health

Sci. 2012; 2(1): 45-50.

Eduardo PP, Teresa M, Monje R, María J, Sanchez R, León D. Mobile Phone Abuse Or Addiction. A

Review Of The Literature. Adicciones. 2012; 24(2).

Kumar SS. Mobile phone and adolescents-addiction a mindful check in! International Journal of Advanced

Nursing Studies. 2014; 3(1): 42-6.

Halayem S, Nouira O, Bourgou S, Bouden A, Othman S, Halayem M. The mobile: a new addiction upon

adolescents. Tunis Med. 2010; 88(8): 593-6. PMID: 20711967.

Augner C, Hacker GW. Associations between problematic mobile phone use and psychological parameters

in young adults. International journal of public health. 2012; 57(2): 437-41. doi: 10.1007/s00038-011-0234- z. PMID: 21290162.

Maron BA, Fein S, Maron BJ, Hillel AT, El Baghdadi MM, Rodenhauser P, editors. Ability of prospective

assessment of personality profiles to predict the practice specialty of medical students. Baylor University

Medical Center Proceedings. 2007.

Zhaoyun CSCSH, Qian L. The Research on Relation Between Short Message Service and Personality

Characteristic for College Students. Psychology Exploration. 2005; 3.

Marlatt GA, Baer JS, Donovan DM, Kivlahan DR. Addictive behaviors: Etiology and treatment. Annual

review of Psychology. 1988; 39(1): 223-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.001255. PMID: 3278676.

Eysenck HJ. Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and

Individual Differences. 1991; 12(8): 773-90.

Ezoe S, Toda M, Yoshimura K, Naritomi A, Den R, Morimoto K. Relationships of personality and lifestyle

with mobile phone dependence among female nursing students. Social Behavior and Personality: an

international journal. 2009; 37(2): 231-8. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2009.37.2.231.

Vaidya NA, Sierles FS, Raida MD, Fakhoury FJ, Przybeck TR, Cloninger CR. Relationship between

specialty choice and medical student temperament and character assessed with Cloninger Inventory.

Teaching and learning in medicine. 2004; 16(2): 150-6. doi: 10.1207/s15328015tlm1602_6. PMID:

Kluger M, Laidlaw T, Kruger N, Harrison M. Personality traits of anaesthetists and physicians: an

evaluation using the Cloninger Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI‐125). Anaesthesia. 1999;

(10): 926-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.01112.x. PMID: 10540055.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-14