Effects of Nanoparticles on the Environment and Outdoor Workplaces
Keywords:
Nanotechnology; Nanoparticles; Environmental impactsAbstract
Today, most parts of different nanotechnologies are growing and developing without any special rules and regulations. This could result in undesirable changes in the environment and affect workers in indoor and outdoor workplaces. Carbon-based nanoparticles, such as fullerenes, nanotubes, the oxides of metals such as iron and titanium, and natural inorganic compounds, including asbestos and quartz, can have biological effects on the environment and human health. The risk assessment of such nanoparticles requires evaluation of their mobility, reactivity, environmental toxicity, and stability. With the increasing use of nanoparticles for commercial and industrial purposes, the debate becomes whether the numerous benefits of nanoparticles can overcome the economic costs, environmental impacts, and unknown risks resulting from their use. To date, few studies have been conducted on the toxic and environmental effects that result from direct and indirect exposure to nanoparticles, and there are no clear standards to determine their effects. Lack of technical information in this regard has provided an appropriate context for supporters and opponents of nanoparticles to present contradictory and ill-considered results. Such an uncertain atmosphere has caused increased concerns about the effects of nanoparticles. Therefore, adequate studies to determine the exact, real risks of the use of nanoparticles are required. The information resulting from these studies can be useful in minimizing the environmental hazards that could arise from the use of nanoparticles. Thus, this paper briefly explains the classification of environmental nanoparticles and how to deal with their formation, diffusion, environmental fate and impacts, and our exposure to them.
References
Guzman KAD, Taylor MR, Banfield JF. Environmental risks of nanotechnology: national nanotechnology initiative funding, 2000–2004. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:1401–1407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Roco MC. Environmentally responsible development of nanotechnology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39:106A–112A. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
EPA . Nanotechnology White Paper. Washington DC 20460, USA: 2007. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA 100/B-07/001. [Google Scholar]
Nowack B, Bucheli TD. Occurrence, behavior and effectsof nanoparticles in the environment. Environmental Pollution. 2007;150:5–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Buffle J. The key role of environmental colloids/nanoparticles for the sustainability of life. Environ. Chem. 2006;3:155–158. [Google Scholar]
Blackford DB, Simons GR. Particle-size analysis of carbon-black. Part Charact. 1987:112–117. [Google Scholar]
Heymann D, Jenneskens LW, Jehlicka J, Koper C, Vlietstra E. Terrestrial and extraterrestrial fullerenes. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2003;11:333–370. [Google Scholar]
Zereini F, Wiseman C, Alt F, Messerschmidt J, Muller J, Urban H. Platinum and rhodium concentrations in airborne particulate matter in Germany from 1988 to 1998. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001;35:1996–2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Giles J. Top five in physics. Nature. 2006;441:265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dai HJ. Carbon nanotubes: synthesis, integration, and properties. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002;35:1035–1044. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Koziara JM, Lockman PR, Allen DD, Mumper RJ. In situ bloodebrain barrier transport of nanoparticles. Pharm. Res. 2003;20:1772–1778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nowack B. Pollution prevention and treatment using nanotechnology. In: Krug HF, editor. Nanotechnology. Springer; in press. [Google Scholar]
Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006;311:622–627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005;113:823–839. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Armstrong B, Hutchinson E, Unwin J, Fletcher T. Lung cancer risk after exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a review and metaanalysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004;112:970–978. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Zhu Y, Zhao Q, Li Y, Cai X, Li W. The interaction and toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnol. 2006c;6:1357–1364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Thill A, Zeyons O, Spalla O, Chauvat F, Rose J, Auffan M, Flank AM. Cytotoxicity of CeO2 nanoparticles for Escherichia coli. Physico-chemical insight of the cytotoxicity mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:6151–6156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Templeton RC, Ferguson PL, Washburn KM, Scrivens WA, Chandler GT. Life-cycle effects of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) on an estuarine meiobenthic copepod. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:7387–7393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Roberts AP, Mount AS, Seda B, Souther J, Qiao R, Lin S, Ke PC, Rao AM, Klaine SJ. In vivo biomodification of lipid-coated carbon nanotubes by Daphnia magna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41:3025–3029. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Fang J, Lyon DY, Dong J, Alvarez PJJ. Effect of a fullerene water suspension on bacterial phospholipids and membrane phase behavior. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41:2636–2642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004;275:177–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, Holt K, Kouri JB, Ramirez JT, Yacaman MJ. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnol. 2005;16:2346–2353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lok CN, Ho CM, Chen R, He QY, Yu WY, Sun HZ, Tam PKH, Chiu JF, Che CM. Proteomic analysis of the mode of antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles. Proteome Res. 2006;5:916–924. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lovern SB, Klaper R. Daphnia magna mortality when exposed to titanium dioxide and fullerene (C60) nanoparticles. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2006;25:1132–1137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Morawska L, Wang H, Ristovski Z, Jayaratne ER, Johnson G, Cheung HC, Ling X, He C. Environmental Monitoring of Nanoparticles (review) Queensland University of Technology; Australia: 2009. [Google Scholar]
Air Resources Board . PLANNED AIR POLLUTION RESEARCH. California Environmental Protection Agency; 2008. [Google Scholar]
Casuccio G, Ogle R, Bunker K, Rickabaugh K, et al. Worker and Environmental Assessment of Potential Unbound Engineered Nanoparticle Releases, Phase III Final Report: validation of preliminary control band assignments. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and RJ Lee Group, Inc; canada: 2010. [Google Scholar]
Spielvogel J, Guo X, Pesch M, Keck L, Hagler R, New A. Real-time Exposure Monitor for Measuring Airborne Nanoparticles. GRIMM Aerosol Technik GmbH & Co; Bayern, Germany: [Google Scholar]
Yang L, Watts DJ. Particle surface characteristics may play an important role in phytotoxicity of alumina nanoparticles. Toxicol. Lett. 2005;158:122–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hund-Rinke K, Simon M. Ecotoxic effect of photocatalytic active nanoparticles TiO2 on algae and daphnids. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2006;13:225–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nowack B, Schulin R, Robinson BH. A critical assessment of chelantenhanced metal phytoextraction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:5225–5232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Reijnders L. Cleaner nanotechnology and hazard reduction of manufactured nanoparticles. Clean. Prod. 2006;14:124–133. [Google Scholar]
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Knowledge Kingdom Publishing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.