Comparing the image quality of tissue harmonic and conventional B-mode ultrasound of kidney in over-obese individuals

Authors

  • Bita Abbasi MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Keywords:

Ultrasonography, Image enhancement, Diagnostic imaging

Abstract

Background: Increased subcutaneous fat thickness and depth of target organs in over-obese patients, results in weak signals and inadequate images. Tissue harmonic imaging has been used widely in obese patients and is believed to result in higher quality images. This superiority is not proved in modern machines with improved image quality in conventional mode.  Objective: To compare the image quality between conventional and tissue harmonic ultrasound images.  Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out from March 2015 to June 2016. Seventy-six over-obese patients referred to Ghaem Hospital (Mashhad, Iran) for weight-correction surgeries, were enrolled into the study. Conventional and tissue harmonic images of their kidneys were blinded and compared back-to-back by four expert radiologists. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 16, using Cochrane’s Q test. Results: All raters reported image quality to be better in tissue harmonic compared to fundamental frequency ultrasound (p=0.000, Cochrane’s Q test). Although better image quality in tissue harmonic mode was reported by the four raters, there was weak inter-observer agreement (p=0.081 for right kidney and p=0.21 for left kidney).  Conclusion: Advances in ultrasound equipment and the introduction of tissue harmonic imaging can improve the diagnostic performance in over-obese patients and this mode of imaging should be used whenever evaluating over-obese subjects.

 

 

References

WHO. Obesity and overweight. WHO. 2018. Available from:

www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.

Choi YS, Berry-Caban C, Stratman R, Fleming JH. Prevalence of high body mass index among children

and adolescents at a US military treatment facility, 2008-2009. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012; 9: E166. doi:

5888/pcd9.120051. PMID: 23153773, PMCID: PMC3505115.

Bahrami H, Sadatsafavi M, Pourshams A, Kamangar F, Nouraei M, Semnani S, et al. Obesity and

hypertension in an Iranian cohort study; Iranian women experience higher rates of obesity and hypertension

than American women. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6: 158. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-158. PMID:

WHO. Global Database on Body Mass Index. 2015. Available from:

http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html&.

Modica MJ, Kanal KM, Gunn ML. The obese emergency patient: imaging challenges and solutions.

Radiographics. Radiographics. 2011; 31(3): 811-23. doi: 10.1148/rg.313105138. PMID: 21571658.

Choudhry S, Gorman B, Charboneau JW, Tradup DJ, Beck RJ, Kofler JM, et al. Comparison of tissue

harmonic imaging with conventional US in abdominal disease. Radiographics. 2000; 20(4): 1127-35. doi:

1148/radiographics.20.4.g00jl371127. PMID: 10903701.

Paladini D, Vassallo M, Tartaglione A, Lapadula C, Martinelli P. The role of tissue harmonic imaging in

fetal echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23(2): 159-64. doi: 10.1002/uog.962. PMID:

Shapiro RS, Wagreich J, Parsons RB, Stancato-Pasik A, Yeh HC, Lao R. Tissue harmonic imaging

sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol.

; 171(5): 1203-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.5.9798848. PMID: 9798848.

Tranquart F, Grenier N, Eder V, Pourcelot L. Clinical use of ultrasound tissue harmonic imaging.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999; 25(6): 889-94. PMID: 10461715.

Uppal T. Tissue harmonic imaging. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2010; 13(2): 29-31. doi: 10.1002/j.2205- 0140.2010.tb00155.x. PMID: 28191082, PMCID: PMC5024862.

Kollmann C. New sonographic techniques for harmonic imaging--underlying physical principles. Eur J

Radiol. 2007; 64(2): 164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.07.024. PMID: 17875378.

Paladini D. Sonography in obese and overweight pregnant women: clinical, medicolegal and technical

issues. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33(6): 720-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6393. PMID: 19479683.

Szopinski KT, Pajk AM, Wysocki M, Amy D, Szopinska M, Jakubowski W. Tissue harmonic imaging:

utility in breast sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22(5): 479-87. PMID: 12751859.

Ranga U, Kalra N, Saxena AK, Bhatia A, Sandhu MS, Duseja AK, et al. Focal hepatic lesions

characterisation by different sonographic techniques: a prospective analysis. J Ultrasound. 2015; 19(1): 15- 23. doi: 10.1007/s40477-015-0172-3. PMID: 26941878, PMCID: PMC4762844.

Bartram U, Darge K. Harmonic versus conventional ultrasound imaging of the urinary tract in children.

Pediatr Radiol. 2005; 35(7): 655-60. doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-1415-9. PMID: 15750811.

Blaivas M, DeBehnke D, Sierzenski PR, Phelan MB. Tissue harmonic imaging improves organ

visualization in trauma ultrasound when compared with standard ultrasound mode. Acad Emerg Med.

; 9(1): 48-53. PMID: 11772669.

Published

2021-12-24

Issue

Section

Articles