Use of the Finnish method to quantify the ergonomic properties in an office environment among the workplaces in an Electricity Distribution Company in West Tehran Province
Keywords:
workplace, occupational injuries, questionnairesAbstract
Introduction: The workplace plays an important role in workers’ performances, but most workplaces have not been designed and equipped in keeping with primary ergonomic principles. Ignoring these principles can cause ergonomic risk factors, difficulties for workers, and damage to workers’ health. The aim of this study was to identify acceptable ergonomic properties in workplaces in order to determine and investigate the aspects of workstations that cause occupational discomfort. To accomplish this aim, we used the Finish method to evaluate workstations in an electricity distribution company in Tehran.
Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted for all of the workstations in an electrical power distribution company using the census method. The desired information was collected through objective observation using the Finish checklist of ergonomic issues in the workplace. Then, we used SPSS version 16 to analyze the information.
Results: In 11.2% of the workstations, none of the ergonomic principles was considered, so workers’ bodied were not situated appropriately while they were working. In 31% of the cases, lighting ranged between 10% and 50% of the recommended amount, and some of the workers appeared to be in a slight daze. In 42.3% of the cases, the temperature in the workplace was in the range of 25 to 27 oC. In 42.3 and 52.3% of the cases, ratings of noise were 2 and 3, respectively, indicating that the noise levels were 60-70 dB and 70-80 dB, respectively.
Conclusion: The findings of this study can be used to determine ergonomic deficiencies in workstations so they can be resolved. Based on our investigation, it was found that the workstations, first and foremost, had significant defects in terms of work components. Furthermore, there were some irritating problems concerning noise and concerning comfort levels related to the high temperature.
References
Shikdar AA, Das B. A field study of worker productivity improvements. Appl Ergon. 1995 Feb;26(1):21–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Johanning E. Evaluation and management of occupational low back disorders. Am J In Med. 2000 Jan;37(1):94–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lavender SA, Conrad KM, Reichelt PA, Meyer FT, Johnson PW. Postural analysis of paramedics simulating frequently performed strenuous work tasks. Appl Ergon. 2000 Feb;31(1):45–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gagnon M, Larrivé A, Desjardins P. Strategies of load tilts and shoulders positioning in asymmetrical lifting. Aconcomitant evaluation of the reference systems of axes. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2000 Aug;15(7):478–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cox RAF, Edwards FC, Palmer K. Fitness for work: The medical aspects. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 210–34. [Google Scholar]
Oborne DJ. Ergonomics at Work: Human Factors in Design and Development. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; pp. 1995pp. 236–9. [Google Scholar]
Abrahamsson L. Production ecomomics analysis of investment initiated to improve working environment. Appl Ergon. 2000 Feb;31(1):1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
American Conference of Industrial Hygienists . ACGIH, Threshold Limit Value for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Indices. Cincinnati, Ohio: American Conference of Industrial Hygienists; 2009. p. 135. [Google Scholar]
Yousefi HA, Hassanzadeh A. Evaluation of workstation in a metal industry company. Journal of Health Systems investigations. 2010;6(1):57–63. [Google Scholar]
Habibi E, Yar Mohammadian MH, Pourabdian S, ghorbani H, Soltani A. Ergonomic assessment of the Laboratories Hospital Workstations Isfahan Medical University. Journal of Iran Occupational Health. 2007 Jan;3(3,4):61–67. [Google Scholar]
Vieira ER, Kumar S. Working Postures: A Literature Review. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(2):143–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nussbaum MA. Torres N. Effects of Training in modifying working metods during common pation handling activities. Int j ind Ergon. 2001;27(1):27–41. [Google Scholar]
Hammett Joe Y. Implementation of ergonomics in the office environment. Health Center of East Azarbaijan Province. 2011 Jul [Google Scholar]
Rahimi A, Hsnky Veisi M. Ergonomic management of physical factors disadvantageous. 1st National Conference on Health, Safety an d Environment (HSE), Islamic Azad University Mahshahr; 2011. [Google Scholar]
Jalalian M, Danial AH. Writing for academic journals: A general approach. Electronic physician. 2012;N4(2):474–476. doi: 10.14661/2012.474-476. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jalalian M. Writing an eye-catching and evocative abstract for a research article: A comprehensive and practical approach. Electronic Physician. 2012;4(3):520–524. doi: 10.14661/2012.520-524. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Knowledge Kingdom Publishing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
