Acute Pancreatitis Between Practice and Recommendations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26415/2572-004X-vol4iss3p561-567Keywords:
acute pancreatitis; Atlanta conferences; associations of pancreatology.Abstract
Background:Acute inflammation of the pancreas, acute pancreatitis (AP) shows an increasing incidence in the world as well as in Algeria. However, lethality and mortality are decreasing, mainly due to recommendations from Atlanta, the International Pancreatology Association and the American Pancreatology Association. The purpose of this work was to analyze the management of AP in the general surgery department of the UHC of Sidi Bel Abbes.
Method: In a retrospective study, 100 acute pancreatitis cases admitted to general surgery between January 2017 and December 2019 were analyzed.
The abdominal scanner was systematic at the admission. The rate of lipasemia, when greater than 3 times the normal one, allowed, in association with the evocative pain, to make the diagnosis. The severity of AP was assessed using the Balthazar score. An MRI was requested when the scanner was inconclusive, to look for an etiology and / or possible complications. 79 (79%) patients received broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and diet was systematic.
Results: We have transmitted the recommendations of scholar societies to the various specialists and the management of AP is currently more unified and more effective. Scanner is no longer systematic in the early phase. Antibiotic therapy is no longer administered without biological evidence. Enteral nutrition is now possible.
Conclusion: We were able to reach the goal of reducing hospitalization and scanning requests. A further analysis of 100 other PA files is planned to confirm the obtained results.
Downloads
References
2. Banks, P.A., Epidemiology, natural history, and predictors of disease outcome in acute and chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc, 2002. 56(6 Suppl): p. S226-30.
3. Yadav, D. and A.B. Lowenfels, Trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas, 2006. 33(4): p. 323-30.
4. Krishna, S.G., et al., The Changing Epidemiology of Acute Pancreatitis Hospitalizations: A Decade of Trends and the Impact of Chronic Pancreatitis. Pancreas, 2017. 46(4): p. 482-488.
5. Peery, A.F., et al., Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology, 2012. 143(5): p. 1179-1187 e3.
6. Lowenfels, A.B., P. Maisonneuve, and T. Sullivan, The changing character of acute pancreatitis: epidemiology, etiology, and prognosis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2009. 11(2): p. 97-103.
7. Roberts, S.E., et al., The incidence and aetiology of acute pancreatitis across Europe. Pancreatology, 2017. 17(2): p. 155-165.
8. Banks, P.A., et al., Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut, 2013. 62(1): p. 102-11.
9. Bradley, E.L., 3rd, A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg, 1993. 128(5): p. 586-90.
10. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology, 2013. 13(4 Suppl 2): p. e1-15.
11. Bollen, T.L., et al., A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol, 2012. 107(4): p. 612-9.
12. Sarr, M.G., et al., The new revised classification of acute pancreatitis 2012. Surg Clin North Am, 2013. 93(3): p. 549-62.
13. Balthazar, E.J., et al., Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology, 1985. 156(3): p. 767-72.
14. Balthazar, E.J., P.C. Freeny, and E. vanSonnenberg, Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology, 1994. 193(2): p. 297-306.
15. Balthazar, E.J., et al., Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology, 1990. 174(2): p. 331-6.
16. Mortele, K.J., et al., A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004. 183(5): p. 1261-5.
17. Bharwani, N., et al., Acute pancreatitis: the role of imaging in diagnosis and management. Clin Radiol, 2011. 66(2): p. 164-75.
18. Leppaniemi, A., et al., 2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis. World J Emerg Surg, 2019. 14: p. 27.
19. Wittau, M., et al., Systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2011. 46(3): p. 261-70.
20. Forsmark, C.E., S.S. Vege, and C.M. Wilcox, Acute Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med, 2016. 375(20): p. 1972-1981.
21. Wu, B.U. and P.A. Banks, Clinical management of patients with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology, 2013. 144(6): p. 1272-81.
22. French Consensus Conference on Acute Pancreatitis: Conclusions and Recommendations. Paris, France, 25-26 January 2001. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2001. 13 Suppl 4: p. S1-13.
23. Dellinger, E.P., et al., Early antibiotic treatment for severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Surg, 2007. 245(5): p. 674-83.
24. Mazaki, T., Y. Ishii, and T. Takayama, Meta-analysis of prophylactic antibiotic use in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg, 2006. 93(6): p. 674-84.
25. Nathens, A.B., et al., Management of the critically ill patient with severe acute pancreatitis. Crit Care Med, 2004. 32(12): p. 2524-36.
26. Al-Omran, M., et al., Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010(1): p. CD002837.
27. da Costa, D.W., et al., Staged multidisciplinary step-up management for necrotizing pancreatitis. Br J Surg, 2014. 101(1): p. e65-79.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Medical Technologies Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
