Patterns of digital device usage and its related health effects on elementary and middle school students
An instrument development and regression analysis
Keywords:
Cellular Phone; Computer; Eyestrain; Syndrome; User-Computer Interface; VisionAbstract
Background: The use of digital devices has increased tremendously during recent years in Saudi Arabia. Many concerns were raised about the safety of this technology. Objective: To develop an instrument for determining the pattern of use of digital devices, and to investigate the link between the use of digital devices and visual symptoms among students of general education schools. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out from the beginning of April 2017 to the end of September 2017 among students of general education schools in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. The study sample included 475 randomly selected participants. A self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. The questionnaire had two parts: the first part was about personal information of the study participants, while the second part was about the pattern of use of digital devices, associated visual complaints after use, and recommendations to decrease visual health hazards. IBM-SPSS version 22 was used to conduct the statistical analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations with visual and muscular complaints; odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were generated. Chi square goodness-of-fit test was used to compare categorical variable frequencies across different groups. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 475 students completed the questionnaire. Nearly half the respondents were males aged more than 19 years old (p<0.001). Most respondents attended secondary schools (p<0.001). Most users experienced neck or shoulder pain (n=305, 64.2%, p<0.001), followed by headaches (n=301, 63.4%, p<0.001), and visual disturbances (n = 275, 57.9%, p=0.001). The majority of students used cellular phones or tablets (n=389, 83.8%). Half the respondents spent more than 4 hours daily using digital devices (p<0.001) and had 2 or more devices. Most students agreed that decreasing the duration of usage (n=217, 45.7%) and scheduling hours (n=214, 45.1%) are the best solutions to decrease the health hazards of digital devices. Logistic regression analysis identified female gender (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.6-4.8, p<0.001) and exposure to digital devices for more than 2 hours per day (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4-6.3, p=0.006) as significant predictors of symptoms. Conclusion: A significant proportion of school students were aware that prolonged use of digital devices is associated with visual and muscular complaints. Females and individuals spending more than 2 hours a day using these devices are more prone to visual and muscular complaints. Decreasing the hours of usage is necessary to avoid digital device-related health risks.References
AlOrainy A. Recent research on mobile phones effects. Proceedings of the International Conference on
Non-Ionizing Radiation at UNITEN (ICNIR 2003) Available from: http://www.who.int/peh- emf/meetings/archive/en/paper09alorainy.pdf
Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computer‐
mediated Communication. 2007; 13(1): 210-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
Pempek TA, Yermolayeva YA, Calvert SL. College students' social networking experiences on Facebook.
Journal of applied developmental psychology. 2009; 30(3): 227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.
Farahani HA, Kazemi Z, Aghamohamadi S, Bakhtiarvand F, Ansari M. Examining mental health indices in
students using Facebook in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 28: 811-4. doi:
1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.148.
Balik HH, Turgut-Balik D, Balikci K, Ozcan IC. Some ocular symptoms and sensations experienced by
long term users of mobile phones. Pathologie-biologie. 2005; 53(2): 88-91. doi:
1016/j.patbio.2004.03.012. PMID: 15708652. 6) Meo SA, Al-Drees AM. Mobile phone related-hazards and subjective hearing and vision symptoms in the
Saudi population. International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health. 2005; 18(1):
-7. PMID: 16052891.
Oftedal G, Wilen J, Sandstrom M, Mild KH. Symptoms experienced in connection with mobile phone use.
Occup Med (Lond). 2000; 50(4): 237-45. doi: 10.1093/occmed/50.4.237. PMID: 10912374.
Kramarenko AV, Tan U. Effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human EEG: a brain mapping
study. International Journal of Neuroscience. 2003; 113(7): 1007-19. doi: 10.1080/00207450390220330.
PMID: 12881192.
Trueman G, Tang L, Abdel-Rahman U, Abdel-Rahman W, Ong K, Cosic I. Human brain wave activity
during exposure to radiofrequency field emissions from mobile phones. Australasian Physics &
Engineering Sciences in Medicine. 2003; 26(4):162-7. PMID: 14995060.
Lepp A, Barkley JE, Karpinski AC. The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in
a sample of US college students. Sage Open. 2015; 5(1). doi: 10.1177/2158244015573169.
Lee H, Kim MS, Son HK, Ahn S, Kim JS, Kim YH. Discriminating power of socio-demographic and
psychological variables on addictive use of cellular phones among middle school students. Journal of
Korean Academy of Nursing. 2007; 37(6): 957-65. PMID: 17992068.
Takao M, Takahashi S, Kitamura M. Addictive personality and problematic mobile phone use.
CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2009; 12(5): 501-7. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0022. PMID: 19817562.
Hardell L, Mild KH, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F. Tumour risk associated with use of cellular telephones or
cordless desktop telephones. World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2006; 4(1): 74. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819- 4-74. PMID: 17034627, PMCID: PMC1621063.
Krishnan S, Zakaria A, Khalil F, Jofree S. The Effect of Electronic Device on Human Health. Management.
; 7(1): 40-3. doi: 10.5923/j.mm.20170701.05.
Charan J, Biswas T. How to Calculate Sample Size for Different Study Designs in Medical Research?
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2013; 35(2): 121-6. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232. PMID:
, PMCID: PMC3775042.
Kozeis N. Impact of computer use on children's vision. Hippokratia. 2009;13(4): 230. PMID: 20011087,
PMCID: PMC2776336.
Christ A, Gosselin M-C, Christopoulou M, Kühn S, Kuster N. Age-dependent tissue-specific exposure of
cell phone users. Physics in medicine and biology. 2010; 55(7): 1767-83. doi: 10.1088/0031- 9155/55/7/001. PMID: 20208098.
Erfanian M, Javadinia SA, Abedini M, Bijari B. Iranian students and social networking sites: Prevalence
and pattern of usage. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 83: 44-6. doi:
1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.009.
Chu C, Rosenfield M, Portello JK, Benzoni JA, Collier JD. A comparison of symptoms after viewing text
on a computer screen and hardcopy. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2011; 31(1): 29-32. PMID:
Rossignol AM, Morse EP, Summers VM, Pagnotto LD. Video display terminal use and reported health
symptoms among Massachusetts clerical workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
; 29(2): 112-8. PMID: 3819890.
Grant AH. The computer user syndrome. Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1987; 58(11):
-901. PMID: 3693780.
Murata K, Araki S, Yokoyama K, Yamashita K, Okumatsu T, Sakou S. Accumulation of VDT workrelated visual fatigue assessed by visual evoked potential, near point distance and critical flicker fusion.
Industrial health. 1996; 34(2): 61-9. PMID: 8857276.
Kirschner PA, Karpinski AC. Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in human behavior. 2010;
(6): 1237-45. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024.
Bijari B, Javadinia SA, Erfanian M, Abedini M, Abassi A. The impact of virtual social networks on
students’ academic achievement in Birjand University of Medical Sciences in East Iran. Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 83: 103-6. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.020.
Beard KW. Internet addiction: Current status and implications for employees. Journal of Employment
Counseling. 2002; 39(1): 2-11. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1920.2002.tb00503.x.
Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology & behavior.
; 1(3): 237-44. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237.
Helland M, Horgen G, Kvikstad TM, Aarås A. Do Background Luminance Levels or Character Size Effect
the Eye Blink Rate During Visual Display Unit (VDU) Work–Comparing Young Adults with Presbyopes?
International Conference on Ergonomics and Health Aspects of Work with Computers; 2007: Springer.
Tribley J, McClain S, Karbasi A, Kaldenberg J. Tips for computer vision syndrome relief and prevention.
Work. 2011; 39(1): 85-7. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1183. PMID: 21673432.
Nakamura H, Matsuzaki I, Hatta K, Nobukuni Y, Kambayashi Y, Ogino K. Nonthermal effects of mobile- phone frequency microwaves on uteroplacental functions in pregnant rats. Reproductive toxicology
(Elmsford, NY). 2003; 17(3): 321-6. doi: 10.1016/S0890-6238(03)00010-8. PMID: 12759101.
Chen H-Y, Yang H-P. Temperature increase in human heads due to different models of cellular phones.
Electromagnetics. 2006; 26(6): 439-59. doi: 10.1080/02726340600837891.
Belk RW. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research. 1988; 15(2): 139-68. doi:
1086/209154.
Gowrisankaran S, Sheedy JE. Computer vision syndrome: A review. Work. 2015; 52(2): 303-14. doi:
3233/WOR-152162. PMID: 26519133.
Verma SB, Gurwood AS. Eye strain (Asthenopia). In: Levy BS, Gregory RW, Rest KM, Weeks JL, editors.
Preventing occupational disease and injury. second ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health
Association; 2005. p. 200 -1. PMID: 16250477.
González ST, Ortiz-Hernández L, Martínez-Alcántara S, Méndez-Ramírez I. Health hazards associated
with the use of video display terminals. Salud Pública de México. 2003; 45(3): 171-80.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 KNOWLEDGE KINGDOM PUBLISHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.