Developing a national formulary based on a unified payment system in Iran

Authors

  • Morteza Amraei Ph.D. Candidate of Health Information Management, Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Iran, National Formulary, Model, Structure, World Health Organization

Abstract

Introduction: The national formulary plays an important role in increasing access to medicine and correct drug information based on national considerations. However, this study aimed to provide a model for development of national formulary based on a unified payment system in Iran.

Methods: This study used a combination of descriptive, comparative, and qualitative methods. It was an applied developmental study in 2016. The data were collected using a form based on the World Health Organization’s (WHO) standard model for national formulary. Using census method, all national formulary of countries available on the WHO website (n=14) were selected for study. The similarities and differences of national formulary of these countries and Iran were compared with the WHO’s standard model. Then, Iran’s national formulary content was determined using comparative study results and opinions of an expert panel consisting of 12 faculty members and assistants of the medicine economy.

Results: Results showed that the content of national formulary in studied countries is consistent with the WHO model. They consisted of four parts: introductory information, medicine information and monograph, appendices, and alphabetical index. In the introductory, which was out of elements of the WHO, the drug selection and advice to patients’ criteria in the preliminary information part of used dose and its side effects in drug monograph and information had the highest frequency. The lowest frequency was for medicine pharmacology and pharmacokinetics in the medicine monograph section. The most common data element in the appendix was related to drug interactions, and the lowest frequency was related to hepatic impairment and renal impairment. All data elements were confirmed by an expert panel. They stated that, after the component of common brand name, the drug cost effectiveness and drug code are necessary for each drug in the drug monograph section.

Conclusion: This study provided an updated model and structure for developing national formulary of Iran based on a unified reimbursement system, WHO model, comparative study of national formulary of selected countries, and the opinion of an expert panel in the field of medicine economy. This model may provide reliable information for health employees and managers and improve the effective and safe use of medicines. Also, the creation of drug formulary based on this model and using it may facilitate the selection of standard and high-quality medicines from among different companies and brands, comparing them with each other, prescribing high-quality medicine with lower price, and avoiding the impact from advertisements.

References

Laing R, Tisoki K. How to Develop a National Formulary Based on The WHO Model Formulary: a

Practical Guide. World Health Organization. 2004; 45.

Sohravardi M. Guide for rational consumption and drug prescription. Esfahan: kankash. 2002.

Ahmadi M, Samadbeik M, Sadoughi F. Modeling of Outpatient Prescribing Process in Iran: A Gateway

toward Electronic Prescribing System .Iran J Pharm Res. 2014; 13(2): 725-38. PMID: 25237369, PMCID:

PMC4157049.

Fischer MA, Vogeli C, Stedman M, Ferris T, Brookhart MA, Weissman JS. Effect of electronic prescribing

with formulary decision support on medication use and cost. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168(22): 2433-9. Doi:

1001/archinte.168.22.2433. PMID: 19064827.

Tahermirzaei M, shahi L. procedure unification of Basic insurance organizations. Sepid. 2015; 11(684).

Zareh H, yazdani N, Azadi M. provide a model for private health insurance in Iran. Teb VA tazkieh. 2015;

(1,2).

Kjos AL, Schommer JC, Yuan Y. A Comparison of Drug Formularies and the Potential for Cost-Savings.

Am Health Drug Benefits. 2010; 3(5): 321-30. PMID: 25126325, PMCID: PMC4106615.

Aidan H. Law S. A national formulary for Canada. Canadaian public policy. 2004: 30(4): 445-52. Doi:

2307/3552524. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3552524?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Huskamp HA, Epstein AM, Blumenthal D. The impact of a national prescription drug formulary on prices,

market share, and spending: lessons for Medicare? Health Aff (Millwood). 2003; 22(3): 149-58. PMID:

Ministry of health of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Food and Drug Department. Iranian official formulary.

Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. 2007.

Scientific center. Research and development gol daru plant Formulary Company. Eshahan: Scientific

center, research and development gol daru plant Formulary Company, 2007.13. British 13. National

Formulary. London: BMJ Group. 2009.

Government of India Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. National Formulary of India. Ghaziabad:

Indian Pharmacopeia Commission. 2001.

Ministry of Health & Population. Egyptian National Formulary. Centeral Administration of Pharmaceutical

Affairs. 2007.

Department of Health. Philippine National Drug Formulary. The National Formulary Committee. 2008.

Marc C, Maria K, Suzanne R. WHO model formulary. World Health Organization. 2008.

Ministry of health of the Islamic republic of Iran. Assessment indicators hospital information system. 2012.

Published

2022-01-18