Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of double inversion recovery sequence compared with FLAIR and T2W_TSE in detection of cerebral multiple sclerosis lesions

Authors

  • Fariborz Faeghi Ph.D. of Medical Physics, Radiology Technology Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Double inversion recovery, FLAIR, T2W_TSE, MRI, Multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. MRI has an important role in early diagnosis of MS within diagnostic criteria. 

Aim: To determine the diagnostic value of the double inversion recovery (DIR) sequence in detection of brain MS lesions.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 55 patients were admitted to the MRI department in Vali-E-Asr Hospital in Qaemshahr, Iran, from May 2016 to February 2016. Imaging was performed on a 1.5T Philips MR system using DIR, fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and T2-weighted turbo spin echo (T2W_TSE) sequences with the same parameters, including field of view (FOV), matrix, slice thickness, voxel size, and number of signal averaging (NSA). The DIR sequence has two different time inversions (TI1=3400, TI2=325ms): suppressing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and white matter signal. Data analysis was performed using the SPSS version 20, and p-value was gained from the patient-wise analysis by Wilcoxon analysis and paired samples t-test for matched pairs.

Results: More lesions in number and size were depicted on the DIR sequence compared with FLAIR (p=0.000 with a relative ratio of 6) and T2W_TSE (p=0.000 with a relative ratio of 10). DIR demonstrated significantly more intracortical lesions compared with FLAIR (p=0.000 with a relative ratio of 2.53) and T2W_TSE (p=0.000 and relative ratio of 8.87). There was significantly higher contrast ratio between the white matter lesions and the normal appearing white matter (NAWM) in all anatomical regions especially in deep white matter (p=0.001).

Conclusion: An increasing total number of MS lesions can be detected by DIR sequence; thus, we recommend adding DIR sequence in routine MR protocols for MS patients.

References

Barkhof F, Rocca M, Francis G, van Waesberghe JH, Uitdehaag BM, Hommes OR, et al. Validation of

diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis and response to interferon β1a.

Annals of neurology. 2003;53(6):718-24. DOI: 10.1002/ana.10551. PMID: 12783417.

Elnekeidy AM, Kamal MA, Elfatatry AM, Elskeikh ML. Added value of double inversion recovery

magnetic resonance sequence in detection of cortical and white matter brain lesions in multiple sclerosis.

The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2014;45(4):1193-9. DOI:

1016/j.ejrnm.2014.06.010.

Minneboo A, Barkhof F, Polman CH, Uitdehaag BM, Knol DL, Castelijns JA. Infratentorial lesions predict

long-term disability in patients with initial findings suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Archives of neurology.

;61(2):217-21. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.61.2.217. PMID: 14967769.

Calabrese M, De Stefano N. Cortical lesion counts by double inversion recovery should be part of the MRI

monitoring process for all MS patients: Yes. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2014;20(5):537-8. DOI:

/1352458514526084. PMID: 24692503.5.

Chen J, Narayanan S, Collins D, Smith S, Matthews P, Arnold D. Relating neocortical pathology to

disability progression in multiple sclerosis using MRI. Neuroimage. 2004;23(3):1168-75. DOI:

1177/1352458514526084. PMID: 24692503.

Calabrese M, Rinaldi F, Mattisi I, Grossi P, Favaretto A, Atzori M, et al. Widespread cortical thinning

characterizes patients with MS with mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2010;74(4):321-8. DOI:

1212/WNL.0b013e3181cbcd03. PMID: 20101038.

Lazeron RH, Langdon D, Filippi M, van Waesberghe JH, Stevenson V, Boringa JB, et al.

Neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis patients: the role of (juxta) cortical lesion on FLAIR.

Multiple sclerosis. 2000;6(4):280-5. DOI: 10.1177/135245850000600410. PMID: 10962549.

Peterson JW, Bö L, Mörk S, Chang A, Trapp BD. Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced

inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Annals of neurology. 2001;50(3):389-400. DOI:

1002/ana.1123. PMID: 11558796.

Sormani MP. Modeling the distribution of new MRI cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis longitudinal

studies by Sormani MP, Calabrese M, Signori A, Giorgio A, Gallo P, De Stefano N [PLoS One 2011; 6

(10): e26712. Epub 2011 October 20]. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2012;1(3):108.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0026712. PMID: 22028937.

Geurts JJ, Barkhof F. Grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis. The Lancet Neurology. 2008;7(9):841- 51. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70191-1. PMID: 18703006.

Yousry TA, Filippi M, Becker C, Horsfield MA, Voltz R. Comparison of MR pulse sequences in the

detection of multiple sclerosis lesions. American journal of neuroradiology. 1997;18(5):959-63. PMID:

Filippi M, Rocca MA. MR imaging of multiple sclerosis. Radiology. 2011;259(3):659-81. DOI:

1148/radiol.11101362. PMID: 21602503.

Bakshi R, Ariyaratana S, Benedict RH, Jacobs L. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance

imaging detects cortical and juxtacortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Archives of neurology.

;58(5):742-8. DOI:10.1001/archneur.58.5.742. PMID: 11346369.

Bedell BJ, Narayana PA. Implementation and evaluation of a new pulse sequence for rapid acquisition of

double inversion recovery images for simultaneous suppression of white matter and CSF. Journal of

Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 1998;8(3):544-7. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880080305. PMID: 9626866.

Vural G, Keklikoğlu H, Temel Ş, Deniz O, Ercan K. Comparison of double inversion recovery and

conventional magnetic resonance brain imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis and relations with

disease disability. The neuroradiology journal. 2013;26(2):133-42. DOI: 10.1177/197140091302600201.

PMID: 23859234.

Redpath T, Smith F. Use of a double inversion recovery pulse sequence to image selectively grey or white

brain matter. The British journal of radiology. 1994;67(804):1258-63. DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-804- 1258. PMID: 7874427.

Wattjes M, Lutterbey G, Gieseke J, Träber F, Klotz L, Schmidt S, et al. Double inversion recovery brain

imaging at 3T: diagnostic value in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions. American journal of

neuroradiology. 2007;28(1):54-9. PMID:17213424.

Ciccarelli O, Chen JT. MS cortical lesions on double inversion recovery MRI Few but true. Neurology.

;78(5):296-7. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318245296f. PMID: 22218282.

Roosendaal S, Moraal B, Pouwels P, Vrenken H, Castelijns J, Barkhof F, et al. Accumulation of cortical

lesions in MS: relation with cognitive impairment. Multiple Sclerosis. 2009;15(6):708-14. DOI:

1177/1352458509102907. PMID: 19435749.

Geurts J, Roosendaal S, Calabrese M, Ciccarelli O, Agosta F, Chard D, et al. Consensus recommendations

for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI. Neurology. 2011;76(5):418-24. DOI:

1212/WNL.0b013e31820a0cc4. PMID: 21209373.

Turetschek K, Wunderbaldinger P, Bankier AA, Zontsich T, Graf O, Mallek R, et al. Double inversion

recovery imaging of the brain: initial experience and comparison with fluid attenuated inversion recovery

imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging. 1998;16(2):127-35. PMID: 9508269.

Geurts JJ, Pouwels PJ, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH, Barkhof F, Castelijns JA. Intracortical Lesions in

Multiple Sclerosis: Improved Detection with 3D Double Inversion-Recovery MR Imaging 1. Radiology.

;236(1):254-60. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2361040450. PMID: 15987979.

Simon J, Li D, Traboulsee A, Coyle P, Arnold D, Barkhof F, et al. Standardized MR imaging protocol for

multiple sclerosis: Consortium of MS Centers consensus guidelines. American Journal of Neuroradiology.

;27(2):455-61. PMID:16484429.

Chard D. Cortical lesion counts by double inversion recovery should be part of the MRI monitoring process

for all MS patients: no. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2014;20(5):539-40. DOI: 10.1177/1352458514526946.

PMID: 24692504.

McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic

criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Annals of neurology. 2001;50(1):121-7. PMID: 11456302.

Pouwels PJ, Kuijer JP, Mugler III JP, Guttmann CR, Barkhof F. Human Gray Matter: Feasibility of Single- Slab 3D Double Inversion-Recovery High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging 1. Radiology. 2006;241(3):873- 9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2413051182. PMID: 17053197.

Calabrese M, De Stefano N, Atzori M, Bernardi V, Mattisi I, Barachino L, et al. Detection of cortical

inflammatory lesions by double inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging in patients with multiple

sclerosis. Archives of neurology. 2007;64(10):1416-22. PMID: 17923625.

Absinta M, Vuolo L, Rao A, Nair G, Sati P, Cortese IC, et al. Gadolinium-based MRI characterization of

leptomeningeal inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2015;85(1):18-28. DOI:

1212/WNL.0000000000001587. PMCID: PMC4501940.

Mathews VP, Caldemeyer KS, Lowe MJ, Greenspan SL, Weber DM, Ulmer JL. Brain: Gadolinium- enhanced Fast Fluid-attenuated Inversion-Recovery MR Imaging 1. Radiology. 1999;211(1):257-63. DOI:

1148/radiology.211.1.r99mr25257. PMID: 10189481.

Moraal B, Roosendaal SD, Pouwels PJ, Vrenken H, Van Schijndel RA, Meier DS, et al. Multi-contrast,

isotropic, single-slab 3D MR imaging in multiple sclerosis. European radiology. 2008;18(10):2311-20.

DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1009-7. PMID: 18509658.

de Graaf WL, Zwanenburg JJ, Visser F, Wattjes MP, Pouwels PJ, Geurts JJ, et al. Lesion detection at seven

Tesla in multiple sclerosis using magnetisation prepared 3D-FLAIR and 3D-DIR. European radiology.

;22(1):221-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2242-z. PMID: 21874361. PMCID: PMC3229693.

Published

2022-01-18

Issue

Section

Articles