Optimization of the photoneutron target geometry for e-accelerator based BNCT
Keywords:
Neutron Therapy; Electron Accelerator; Photoneutron TargetAbstract
Background and aim: Today, electron accelerators are taken into consideration as photoneutron sources. Therefore, for maximum production of epithermal neutron flux, designing a photoneutron target is of significant importance. In this paper, the effect of thickness and geometric shape of a photoneutron target on neutron output were investigated.
Methods: In this study, a pencil photon source with 13, 15, 18, 20 and 25 MeV energies and a diameter of 2 mm was investigated using Monte Carlo simulation method using MCNP code. To optimize the design of the photoneutron target, the tungsten target with various geometries and thicknesses was investigated.
Results: The maximum neutron flux produced for all target geometries and thicknesses occurred at neutron energy peak of around 0.46 MeV. As the thickness increased to 2 cm, neutron flux increased and then a decreasing trend was observed. For various geometrical shapes, the determining factor in photoneutron output was the effective target thickness in the photon interaction path that increased by the increase in the area of interaction. Another factor was the angle of the photon's incidence with the target surface that resulted in a significant decrease in photoneutron output in cone-shaped targets
Conclusion: Three factors including the total neutron flux, neutrons energy spectrum, and convergence of neutrons plays an important role in the selection of geometry and shape of the target that should be investigated considering beam shaping assembly (BSA) shape.
References
Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
Slatkin DN. A history of boron neutron capture therapy of brain tumours. Postulation of a brain radiation
dose tolerance limit. Brain. 1991; 114(Pt 4): 1609-29. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.4.1609. PMID: 1884169.
Bisceglie E, Colangelo P, Colonna N, Santorelli P, Variale V. On the optimal energy of epithermal neutron
beams for BNCT. Phys Med Biol. 2000; 45(1): 49-58. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/1/304. PMID: 10661582.
Allen DA, Beynon TD. A design study for an accelerator-based epithermal neutron beam for BNCT. Physics
in medicine and biology. 1995; 40(5): 807-21. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/40/5/007. PMID: 7652009.
Blue TE, Yanch JC. Accelerator-based epithermal neutron sources for boron neutron capture therapy of brain
tumors. J Neurooncol. 2003; 62(1-2): 19-31. doi: 10.1023/A:1023247222043. PMID: 12749700.
Green S. Developments in accelerator based boron neutron capture therapy. Radiation Physics and
Chemistry. 1998; 51(4-6): 561-9. doi: 10.1016/S0969-806X(97)00203-X.
Kobayashi H, Kurihara T, Matsumoto H, Yoshioka M, Matsumoto N, Kumada H, et al. Construction of a
BNCT facility using an 8-MeV high power proton linac in Ibaraki.
Kononov OE, Kononov VN, Bokhovko MV, Korobeynikov VV, Soloviev AN, Sysoev AS, et al.
Optimization of an accelerator-based epithermal neutron source for neutron capture therapy. Appl Radiat
Isot. 2004; 61(5): 1009-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.05.028. PMID: 15308184.
Floberg J. The physics of boron neutron capture therapy: an emerging and innovative treatment for
glioblastoma and melanoma. Physics and Astronomy Comps Papers. 2005.
Bevilacqua R, Giannini G, Calligaris F, Fontanarosa D, Longo F, Scian G, et al. PhoNeS: A novel approach
to BNCT with conventional radiotherapy accelerators. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research
Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 2007; 572(1): 231-2. doi:
1016/j.nima.2006.10.290.
Ludewigt B, Bleuel D, Chu W, Donahue R, Kwan J, Leung K, et al. Clinical requirements and accelerator
concepts for BNCT. IEEE. 1997. doi: 10.1109/pac.1997.753418.
Naseri A, Mesbahi A. A review on photoneutrons characteristics in radiation therapy with high-energy
photon beams. Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy. 2010; 15(5): 138-44. doi:
1016/j.rpor.2010.08.003. PMID: 24376940, PMCID: PMC3863143.
Nigg D, Mitchell H, Harker Y. Computational and Experimental Studies of an Electron Accelerator Based
Epithermal Photoneutron Source Facility for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. INEL BNCT Research
Program Annual Report 1995. 1996: 27.
Torabi F, Masoudi SF, Rahmani F, Rasouli FS. BSA optimization and dosimetric assessment for an electron
linac based BNCT of deep‐seated brain tumors. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2014;
(3): 1167-74. doi: 10.1007/s10967-014-3087-0.
Salehi D, Sardari D, Jozani MS. Characteristics of a heavy water photoneutron source in boron neutron
capture therapy. Chinese Physics C. 2013; 37(7): 078201. doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/7/078201.
Quintieri L, Bedogni R, Buonomo B, De Giorgi M, Chiti M, Esposito A, et al. A Photoneutron source at the
Daϕne Beam Test Facility of the INFN National Laboratories in Frascati: design and first experimental
results. Physics Procedia. 2012; 26: 249-60. doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.033.
McGinley PH, Butker EK. Evaluation of neutron dose equivalent levels at the maze entrance of medical
accelerator treatment rooms. Medical physics. 1991; 18(2): 279-81. doi: 10.1118/1.596713. PMID: 2046615.
Rahmani F, Shahriari M. Hybrid photoneutron source optimization for electron accelerator-based BNCT.
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors
and Associated Equipment. 2010; 618(1-3, 1-21): 48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2010.02.268.
Huang WL, Li QF, Lin YZ. Calculation of photoneutrons produced in the targets of electron linear
accelerators for radiography and radiotherapy applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics
Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 2005; 229(3-4): 339-47. doi:
1016/j.nimb.2004.12.117.
Giannini G, Borla O, Bevilacqua R, Zanini A. Photoneutron source for in-hospital BNCT treatment:
feasibility study. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Neutron Capture Therapy Takamatsu,
Kagawa, Japan; 2006.
Jallu F, Lyoussi A, Payan E, Recroix H, Mariani A, Nurdin G, et al. Photoneutron production in tungsten,
praseodymium, copper and beryllium by using high energy electron linear accelerator. Nuclear Instruments
and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 1999; 155(4):
-81. doi: 10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00487-5.
Waters LS. MCNPX user’s manual. Los Alamos National Laboratory. 2002.
Followill DS, Stovall MS, Kry SF, Ibbott GS. Neutron source strength measurements for Varian, Siemens,
Elekta, and General Electric linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003; 4(3): 189-94. doi:
1120/1.1571671. PMID: 12841788.
Soppera N, Bossant M, Dupont E. Janis 4: An improved version of the nea java-based nuclear data
information system. Nuclear Data Sheets. 2014; 120: 294-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.071.
Coderre J. Current status of neutron capture therapy. IAEA-TECDOC-1223. IAEA, 2001.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 KNOWLEDGE KINGDOM PUBLISHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
