Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women attending Boo-Ali Hospital Tehran Iran

Urine analysis vs. urine culture

Authors

  • Roksana Darabi M.D Gynecologist, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria; Pregnancy; Urine culture; Screening tests

Abstract

Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria is one of the common problems in pregnancy. Asymptomatic bacteriuria is associated with pyelonephritis, preterm labor and low birth weight infants. The physiological and anatomical changes in pregnancy facilitate urinary tract infection (UTI) during pregnancy. Several tests are available for diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria. The urine culture is a gold standard diagnostic test for asymptomatic bacteriuria but it is expensive and time-consuming. Screening methods may be useful in detecting high-risk pregnant women for asymptomatic bacteriuria.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare urine analysis as a rapid screening test to urine culture in diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria.

Methods: A total of 123 pregnant women attending the obstetrics clinic of Boo-Ali hospital in Tehran, Iran from March 2013 to September 2014 were included in the present diagnostic cross-sectional study. One hundred twenty three mid-stream urine samples were inoculated into cultures and were processed by dipstick (nitrite test and leucocyte esterase test) and microscopic pus cell count. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of nitrite test, leucocyte esterase test and microscopic pus cell count were compared with urine culture in diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria by using SPSS version 19.

Results: Of 123 urine samples, significant asymptomatic bacteriuria (≥104 cfu/Ml) was detected in 8 (6.5%) subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of nitrite test were 37% and 100% respectively. The sensitivity of pus cell count alone and leucocyte esterase test alone were 100% but the specificity of them were 64% and 65% respectively. We found high negative predictive value by Pus cell count and the leucocyte esterase test (100%) and low positive predictive value by them (16% and 17% respectively).

Conclusion: Urine culture is the most useful test for diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria. None of our screening tests had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%, whereas we can only refer the pregnant women with positive leucocyte esterase test and significant pyuria to the urine culture.

References

Begum N. Clinical profile of urinary tract infection in pregnancy. Mymensingh Med J. 1992; 1: 6-10.

Lucas MJ, Cunningham FG. Urinary tract infection in pregnancy. Clinical Obstet Gynaecol.1993; 36: 855–

doi: 10.1097/00003081-199312000-00009.

Patterson TF, Andrriole VT. Bacteriuria in pregnancy. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1987; 1: 807–22. PMID:

Gilbert DN, Moelleving RC Jr, Eliopoulos GN, Sande NA. Sanford guide to Antimicrobial therapy. 32 nd

ed. Hyde Park, Vermont: Antimicrob Therapy, Inc; 2005: 22–3.

Ahmad S, Shakooh S, Salati SA, Muniem A. Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant

women in Kashmir. Sri Lanka J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011; 33: 158-62.

Etminan-Bakhsh M, Darabi R, Tadi S, Mohit M. Frequency Survey of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in

Pregnant Women Attending Boo-Ali Hospital, Tehran. Galen Medical Journal. 2015; 4(4): 159-63.

Olusanya O, Ogunledum A, Fakoya TA. Asymptomatic significant bacteriuria among pregnant and non- pregnant women in Sagamu, Nigeria. WAJM. 1993; 12(1): 27–33.

Akerele P, Abhuliren F, Okonofua J. Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women in

Benin City, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 21(2): 141–4. doi: 10.1080/01443610020026038. PMID:

Gabre-Selassie S. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy; epidemiological clinical and microbiological

approach. Ethiop Med J. 1998; 36: 185–92.

Daneshyar E, Mosavibahar SH, Alikhani MY. Association Between Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Some

demographic variables in pregnant women Refered to Health Centers Affilited to Hamadan University of

Medical Sciences. Scientific Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. 2010: 53–60.

Fatima Ansari Q, Rajkumari A. Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and associated risk factors among

antenatal women attending a tertiary care hospital. Journal of Medical & Allied Sciences. 2011; 1 (2): 74-8.

Angelescu K, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Sieben W, Scheibler F, Gartlehner G. Benefits and harms of screening

for and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and

Childbirth. 2016; 16: 336. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1128.

Mundhada SG, Ingole KV, Bhise MP, Shaikh SV. Evaluation of different screening tests for detection of

Urinary Tract Infection in pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic. Int J Curr Microbial App Sci.

; 5(4): 772-7.

Mambatta AK, Jayarajan J, Rashme VL, Harini S, Menon S, Kuppusamy J. Reliability of dipstick assay in

predicting urinary tract infection. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015; 4(2): 265-8.

Jayalakshmi J, Jayaram VS. Evaluation of various screening tests to detect asymptomatic bacteriuria in

pregnant women. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008; 51(3): 379–81. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.42516. PMID:

Thakre SS, Dhakne SS, Thakre SB, Thakre AD, Ughade SM, Kale P. Can the griess nitrite test and a

urinary pus cell count of ≥5 cells per micro litre of urine in pregnant women be used for the screening or

the early detection of urinary tract infections in rural india? J Clin Diagn Res. 2012; 6(9): 1518-22. doi:

7860/JCDR/2012/4565.2547.

Mukherjee K, Golia S, Vasudha CL, Babita, Bhattacharjee D, Chakroborti G. A study on asymptomatic

bacteriuria in pregnancy: prevalence, etiology and comparison of screening methods. Int J Res Med Sci.

; 2(3): 1085-91. doi: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20140886.

Macejko AM, Schaeffer AJ. Asymptomatic bacteriuria and symptomatic urinary tract infections during

pregnancy. Urol Clin North Am. 2007; 34: 35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2006.10.010. PMID: 17145359.

Bachman JW, Heise RH, Naessone JM, Timmerman MG. A study of various tests to detect asymptomatic

urinary tract infections in an obstetric population. JAMA. 1993; 270: 1971-4. doi:

1001/jama.1993.03510160089035. PMID: 8411555.

Mokube MN, Atashili J, Halle-Ekane GE, Ikomey GM, Ndumbe PM. Bacteriuria amongst pregnant women

in the Buea health district, Cameroon: prevalence, predictors, antibiotic susceptibility patterns and

diagnosis. PLOS One. 2013; 8(8): e71086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071086. PMID: 23976983, PMCID:

PMC3745459.

Michael L.Wilson,Loretto Gaido Laboratory Diagnostic of Urinary Tract Infection in Adult

Patients.Clinical Infectious Disease, 2004; 38(8): 1150-1155. doi: 10.1086/383029, PMid: 15095222

Kurup R, Leich M. Comparison of urine analysis using manual sedimentation methods. West Indian Med J.

; 61(3): 240. doi: 10.7727/wimj.2011.035. PMID: 23155980

Published

2022-02-12