Modelling the regional vulnerability to Echinococcosis based on environmental factors using fuzzy inference system

A case study of Lorestan Province, west of Iran

Authors

  • Zeinab Obeidavi M.Sc. of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran

Keywords:

Echinococcosis; regional vulnerability; environmental variables; fuzzy inference system

Abstract

Background and aim: Echinococcosis as a zoonosis disease is one of the most important parasitic helminth that is affected by many risk factors such as the environmental factors. Thus, we predicted the regional vulnerability to Echinococcosis based on environmental factors using a fuzzy inference system (FIS) in Lorestan Province.  Methods: Our study was cross-sectional study on 200 patients from Lorestan Province (west of Iran) who underwent surgery for hydatidosis between October 2005 and November 2014. In order to model the vulnerability to Echinococcosis, first we determined the effective environmental variables. In the next step, the FIS was designed and implemented using MATLAB v.2012 software. Thus, definition and determination of linguistic variables, linguistic values, and their range were performed based on expert knowledge. Then, the membership functions of inputs (environmental variables) and output (vulnerability to Echinococcosis) were defined. A fuzzy rules base was formed. Also, the defuzzification of output was done using a centroid defuzzification function. To test the accuracy of the predictive model, we calculated the AUC (to this purpose, we used four different thresholds, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) using IDRISI Selva v.17.0 software. Results: Based on the results of this study, Aligoudarz and Koohdasht counties were identified as a highest and lowest risk area in Lorestan, respectively. The results showed that a predictive model was more efficient than a random model (AUC>0.5). Also, potential vulnerable areas cover 78.29% at threshold of 5%, 60.72% at threshold of 10%, 43.54% at threshold of 15%, and 39.82% at threshold of 20% of the study area. Conclusion: According to the success of this research, we emphasized the necessity of attention to fuzzy approach to model vulnerability to hydatidosis. This approach can provide a practical economic basis for making informed preventive services decisions and the allocation of health resources.

 

References

Zhang W, Ross AG, McManus DP. Mechanisms of immunity in hydatid disease: implications for vaccine

development. J Immunol. 2008; 181: 6679–85. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.10.6679. PMID: 18981082.

Zamani A, Kalikias S. Hydatid cyst of the parotid gland: a case report. Iran J Pediatr. 2006; 16: 95-8.

McManus DP, Zhang W, Li J, Bartley PB. Echinococcosis. Lancet. 2003; 362(9392): 1295–304. doi:

1016/s0140-6736(03)14573-4.

The Center for Food Security and Public Health (CFSPH). Echinococcosis.2011. Available from:

http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/echinococcosis.

Iranian Doctors website. Echinococcus granulosus. 2008. Available from: http//: www.pezeshkan.org.

Zibaei M, Azargoon A, Ataie-Khorasgani M, Ghanadi K, Sadjjadi SM. The serological study of cystic

echinococcosis and assessment of surgical cases during 5 years (2007-2011) in Khorram Abad, Iran. Niger

J Clin Pract. 2013; 16: 221-5. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.110156. PMID: 23563466.

Tavakoli HR, Bayat M, Kousha A. Hydatidosis infection study in human and livestock populations during

-2007. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2008; 4(4): 473-7.

Eftekhari F. Clinical and demographic features of patients with hydatid cyst admitted in Kerman university

hospitals between 1991-2000. JKMU. 2005; 12(4): 252-7.

Arambulo P. Public health importance of cystic echinococcosis in Latin America. Acta Trop. 1997; 67:

-24.

Dueger EL, Gilman RH. Prevalence, intensity and fertility of ovine cysticechinococcsis in the central

Peruvian Anders. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001; 95: 379-83. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90188-9.

Scala A, Garippa G, Varcasia A, Tranquillo VM, Genchi C. Cysticechinoccosis in slaughtered sheep in

Sardina (Italy). Vet Parasitol. 2006; 135(1): 33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.08.006. PMID: 16226378.

Aroyehun AA, Sabejeje TA, Bayo-Lebi D, Olawuyi NJ, Ayinla NJ, OgunwaleYE. Fuzzy logic based

predictive model for likelihood of water related disease. Discovery. 2017; 53(257): 321-33.

Pandey M, Singh V, Vaishya RC. Geomatics approach for assessment of respiratory disease mapping. The

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2014; 8:

-11. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-8-205-2014.

Akhavan P, Karimi M, Pahlavani P. Risk Mapping of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis via a Fuzzy C Means-based

Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and

Spatial Information Sciences. 2014; 2: 19-23. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-2-W3-19-2014.

Danson FM, Giraudoux P, Craig PS. Spatial modelling and ecology of Echinococcus multilocularis

transmission in China. Parasitol Int. 2006; 55(Suppl): S227-31. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2005.11.047. PMID:

Yang YR, Liu T, Bai X, Boufana B, Craig PS, Nakao M, et al. Natural infection of the ground squirrel

(Spermophilus spp.) with Echinococcus granulosus in China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009; 3: e518. doi:

1371/journal.pntd.0000518. PMID: 19771151, PMCID: PMC2737643.

Atkinson JA, Gray DJ, Clements ACA, Barnes TS, Mcmanus DP, Yang YR. 2013. Environmental changes

impacting Echinococcus transmission: researchto support predictive surveillance and control. Glob Change

Biol. 2013; 3: 677-88. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12088. PMID: 23504826.

Otero-Abad B, Torgerson PR. 2013. A systematic review of the epidemiology of echinococcosis in

domestic and wild animals. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013; 7(6): e2249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002249.

PMID: 23755310 PMCID: PMC3674998.

Craig PS, Giraudoux P, Shi D, Bartholomot B, Barnish G, Delattre P, et al. An epidemiological and

ecological study of human alveolar echinococcosis transmission in south Gansu, China. Acta Trop. 2000;

: 167-77. doi: 10.1016/S0001-706X(00)00134-0.

Statistical Center of Iran. 2014. Iran statistical yearbook (population). Available from:

https://www.amar.org.ir/english/Iran-Statistical-Yearbook/Statistical-Yearbook-2013-2014.

Giraudoux P, Delattre P, Takahashi K, Raoul F, Quere JP, Craig P, et al. Transmission of ecology of

Ecinococcus multilocularis in wild-life: what can be learned from comparative studies and multi-scale

approaches? Conference of Cestode zoonoses: Echinoccosis and cystercercosis. 2002: 251-66.

Mahfouf M, Abbod MF, Linkens DA. A survey of fuzzy logic monitoring and control utilization in

medicine. Artif Intell Med. 2001; 21(1): 27-42. doi: 10.1016/S0933-3657(00)00072-5.

Shleeg AA, Ellabib IM. Comparison of Mamdani and Sugeno fuzzy interference systems for the breast

cancer risk. International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information

Engineering. 2013; 7(10): 1343-7.

Anderson RP, Gonzalez-Jr I. Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of

species distributions: An implementation with Maxent. Ecol Model. 2011; 222: 2796-811. doi:

1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.04.011.

Escalante T, Rodriguez-Tapia G, Linaje M, Illoldi-Rangel P, Gonzalez-Lopez R. Identification of areas of

endemism from species distribution models: Threshold selection and NEARCTIC mammals. TIP Rev Esp

Cienc Quím Biol. 2013; 16(1): 5-17. doi: 10.1016/S1405-888X(13)72073-4.

Obeidavi Z, Rangzan K, Mirzaei R, Kabolizade M, Amini A. Wildlife Habitats Suitability Modelling using

Fuzzy Inference System: A Case Study of Persian Leopard (Panthera pardus saxicolor) in Shimbar

Protected Area. IJAE. 2017; 6(1): 57-66. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ijae.6.1.57.

Giovanelli JGR, De Siqueira MF, Haddad CFB, Alexandrino J. Modeling a spatially restricted distribution

in the Neotropics: how the size of calibration area affects the performance of five presence-only methods.

Ecol Model. 2010; 221: 215–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.10.009.

Published

2022-02-12