Isolation, Identification, and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Dermatophytes from Clinical Samples at Sohag University Hospital in Egypt

Authors

  • Mona Fattouh Mohamed Shalaby Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Egypt

Keywords:

Dermatophytosis; Dermasel agar; Disk diffusion; Antifungal agents

Abstract

Aim: The objective of this study was to isolate, identify, and explore the in-vitro antifungal susceptibility pattern of dermatophytes isolated from clinically suspected cases of dermatophytosis (tinea infections) attending the Dermatology Outpatient Clinic.

Methods: This study was conducted at Sohag University Hospital from December 2014 to December 2015. Clinical samples (e.g., skin scrapings and hair stumps) were collected under aseptic precautions. The identification of dermatophytes was performed through microscopic examination using 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) with 40% dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) mounts and culture on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and on Dermasel agar base media, both supplemented with chloramphenicol and cycloheximide. All dermatophytes isolates were subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing using the agar-based disk diffusion (ABDD) method against Clotrimazole, Miconazole, Fluconazole, and Griseofulvin. Data were analyzed via SPSS 16, using Chi square and a screening test (cross-tabulation method).

Results: A total of 110 patients of dermatophytosis were studied. The patients were clinically diagnosed and mycologically confirmed as having tinea capitis (49), tinea corporis (30), tinea pedis (16), tinea cruris (9), or tinea barbae (6). The dermatophytes isolates belonged to 4 species: Microsporum canis 58 (52.7%), Microsporum gypseum 23 (20.9%), Trichophyton mentagrophytes 18 (16.4%), and Microsporum audouinii 11 (10%). The most effective antifungal drugs tested were Clotrimazole, followed by Miconazole (95.5% and 84.5% of isolates were susceptible, respectively).  

Conclusion: Every patient with a tinea infection should be properly studied for a mycological examination and should be treated accordingly. Dermasel agar is more useful as an identification medium in the isolation of dermatophytes. The ABDD method appears to be a simple, cost-effective, and promising method for the evaluation of antifungal susceptibility of dermatophytes.

 

References

Alshawa K, Beretti JL, Lacroix C, Feuilhade M, Dauphin B, Quesne G, et al. Successful identification of

clinical dermatophytes and Neoscytalidium species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of

flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50(7): 2277-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06634-11. PMID:

, PMCID: PMC3405581.

Grumbt M, Monod M, Yamada T, Hertweck C, Kunert J, Staib P. Keratin degradation by dermatophytes

relies on cysteine dioxygenase and a sulfite efflux pump. J Invest Dermatol. 2013; 133(6): 1550-5. doi:

1038/jid.2013.41. PMID: 23353986.

Havlickova B, Czaika VA, Friedrich M. Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Mycoses.

; 51(4): 2-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01606.x. PMID: 18783559.

Ananthanarayan R, Paniker CK. Medical mycology, Chapter 65.Textbook of Microbiology; 8th edition.

Hyderabad, India: Universities Press Private Limited. 2009; 604-7.

Achterman RR, White TC. Dermatophyte virulence factors: Identifying and analyzing genes that may

contribute to chronic or acute skin infections. Int J Microbiol. 2012; 2012: 358305. doi:

1155/2012/358305. PMID: 21977036, PMCID: PMC3185252.

Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS, Bailey WR. Bailey and Scott’s Text Book of Diagnostic

Microbiology, 12th Edn. Mobsy Elsevier, St Louis, MO.

Venkatensan G, Singh R, Murugesan AG, Janaki C, Shankar SG. Trichophyton rubrum- the predominant

etiological agent in human dermatophytoses in Chennai, India. African Journal of Microbiology Research.

(1): 9-12.

Yadav A, Urhekar AD, Mane V, Singh Danu M, Goel N, Ajit KG. Optimization and Isolation of

Dermatophytes from Clinical Samples and In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing By Disc Diffusion

Method. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2013; 2(3): 19-34.

Burzykowski T, Molenberghs G, Abeck D, Haneke E, Hay R, Katsambas A. High prevalence of foot

diseases in Europe: results of the Achilles Project. Mycoses. 2003; 46(11-12): 496-505. doi:

1046/j.0933-7407.2003.00933.x. PMID: 14641624.

Theel ES, Hall L, Mandrekar J, Wengenack NL. Dermatophyte identification using matrix-assisted laser

desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49(12): 4067-71. doi:

1128/JCM.01280-11. PMID: 21956979, PMCID: PMC3232958.

Matar MJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Paetznick VL, Rodriguez JR, Chen E, Rex JH. Correlation between Etest,

disk diffusion, and micro dilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole and

voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47(5): 1647-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1647- 1651.2003. PMID: 12709335, PMCID: PMC153338.

Esteban A, Abarca ML, Cabanes FJ. Comparison of disk diffusion method and broth micro dilution method

for antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes. Med Mycol. 2005; 43(1): 61-6. doi:

1080/13693780410001711972. PMID: 15712608.

Pakshir K, Bahaedinie L, Rezaei Z , Sodaifi M, Zomorodian K. In vitro activity of six antifungal drugs

against clinically important dermatophytes. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2009; 2(4): 158-63.

Omar AA. Ringworm of the scalp in primary school children in Alexandria: infection and carriage. East

Mediterr Health J. 2000; 6(5-6): 961-7. PMID: 12197355.

Achterman RR, White TC. A foot in the door for dermatophyte research. PLoS Pathog. 2012; 8(3)

e1002564. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002564. PMID: 22479177, PMCID: PMC3315479.

Madhavi S, Rama Rao MV, Jyothsna K. Mycological study of Dermatophytosis in rural population.

Annuals of Biological Research. 2011; 2(3): 88-93.

Sumathi S, Mariraj J, Shafiyabi S, Ramesh R, Krishna S. Clinicomycological study of dermatophytes. Int J

Pharm Biomed Res. 4(2): 132-4.

Jha BK, Murthy SM, Devi NL. Molecular identification of dermatophytosis by polymerase chain reaction

(PCR) and detection of source of infection by restricted fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Journal of

College of Medical Sciences-Nepal. 2012; 8(4): 7-15. doi: 10.3126/jcmsn.v8i4.8694.

Kannan P, Janaki C, Selvi GS. Prevalence of dermatophytes and other fungal agents isolated from clinical

samples. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006; 24(3): 212-15. PMID: 16912443.

Amer M, Taha M, Tosson Z, El-Garf A. the frequency of causative dermatophytes in Egypt. Int J Dermatol.

; 20(6): 431-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1981.tb02009.x. PMID: 7263125.

Emele FE, Oyeka CA. Tinea capitis among primary school children in Anambra state of Nigeria. Mycoses.

; 51(6): 536-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01507.x. PMID: 18422917.

Nweze EI, Okafor JI. Prevalence of dermatophytic fungal infections in children: a recent study in Anambra.

Mycopathologia. 2005; 160(3): 239-43. doi: 10.1007/s11046-005-0124-0. PMID: 16205973.

Chandra J. Textbook of Medical Mycology. Mehta Publishers, New Delhi. 1996; 67-79.

Rebell G, Taplin D. Dermatophytes: Their recognition and identification. 2nd ed Miami University Press,

Miami. 1974; 124.

Mehta JP, Deodhar KP, Mehta VR, Chapnekar PM. A study of dermaotmycosis in Bombay. Indian J Pathol

Microbiol. 1977; 20(1): 23-31. PMID: 873579.

Tampieri MP. Actuality on diagnosis of dermatomycosis. Parassitologia. 2004; 46(1-2): 183-6. PMID:

Girgis SA, Zu El–Fakkar NM, Badr H, Shaker OA, Metwally FE, Bassim HH. Genotypic identification and

antifungal susceptibility pattern of dermatophytes isolated from clinical specimens of dermatophytosis in

Egyptian patients. Egyptian Dermatology Online Journal. 2005; 2(2).

Galuppi R, Gambarara A, Bonoli C, Ostanello F, Tampieri MP. Antimycotic effectiveness against

dermatophytes: comparison of two in vitro tests. Vet Res Commun. 2010; 34(1): 57-61. doi:

1007/s11259-010-9386-1. PMID: 20490661.

Rezende C, Borsari GP, Da Silva AC, Cavalcanti FR. Dermatophytosis epidemiologic study in public

institution of Barretos city, São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Anal Clin. 40(2): 6-13.

Nweze EI, Mukherjee PK, Ghannoum MA. Agar-Based Disk Diffusion Assay for Susceptibility Testing of

Dermatophytes. J Clin Microbiol. 2010; 48(10): 3750-2. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01357-10. PMID: 20668120,

PMCID: PMC2953072.

Santos JI, Paula CR, Viani FC, Gambale W. Susceptibility testing of Trichophyton rubrum and

Microsporum canis to three azoles by E-test. Journal de Mycologie Medicale. 2001; 11(1): 42-3. doi: 03- 2001-11-1-1156-5233-101019.

Fernández-Torres B, Cabañes FJ, Carrillo-Munõz AJ, Esteban A, Inza I, Abarca L, et al. Collaborative

evaluation of optimal antifungal susceptibility testing condition for dermatophytes. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;

(11): 3999-4003. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.3999-4003.2002. PMID: 12409365, PMCID: PMC139645.

Nweze EI, Ogbonna CC, Okafor JI. In vitro susceptibility testing of dermatophytes isolated from pediatric

cases in Nigeria against five antifungals. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2007; 49(5): 293-5. doi:

1590/S0036-46652007000500004. PMID: 18026635.

Magagnin CM, Stopiglia CD, Vieira FJ, Heidrich D, Machado M, Vetoratto G, et al. Antifungal

susceptibility of dermatophytes isolated from patients with chronic renal failure. An Bras Dermatol. 2011;

(4): 694-701. doi: 10.1590/S0365-05962011000400011. PMID: 21987135.

Published

2022-03-07

Issue

Section

Articles