Consumer Perception and Preference of Drinking Water Sources
Keywords:
Consumer perception, Tap water, Water quality, Water source, Drinking waterAbstract
Introduction: Understanding consumer perception of drinking water can contribute to improvements in water management and consumer satisfaction. The aim of this study was to assess the consumer perception of tap water quality and other drinking water sources in Gonabad as a small semiarid city.
Methods: This study was performed in autumn and winter 2013. For collection data a researcher-made a questionnaire consisting of nine questions, based on demographic information prepared. Questions were asked for participants to provide information regarding household drinking water usage and patterns, opinion about tap water safety, taste and reasons for purchasing bottled water. For statistical analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS version 16 was applied in this study.
Results: Results showed that demographic variables had a significant relationship with consumer satisfaction (p < 0.05). Office employees, women and poor families had the most satisfaction from tap water quality. Peoples’ preferences for tap water, commercial softener, domestic softener, ghanat (a type of underground cistern) and bottled water were 27.8, 19, 27.8, 40.4 and 3.5% respectively. Dissatisfaction from production of foam, unsuitable taste, unacceptable appearance and other problems in tap water was 11.1, 95.6, 27.8 and 0.4% respectively. Consumer reasons for using domestic water softeners are: suitable taste (80%), easy availability (71%), economical (56%) and low health side effects (34%).
Conclusion: According to these results it was clear that each consumer group, based on self-condition, prefers using a specific drinking water source.
References
Kozisek F. Health risks from drinking demineralised water. Nutrients in Drinking Water. 2005; 148-63.
Biglari H, Chavoshani A, Javan N, Mahvi AH. Geochemical study of groundwater conditions with special
emphasis on fluoride concentration, Iran. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016; 57(47): 1-8. doi:
1080/19443994.2015.1133324.
Mirzabeygi M, Naji M, Yousefi N, Shams M, Biglari H, Mahvi AH. Evaluation of corrosion and scaling
tendency indices in water distribution system: a case study of Torbat Heydariye, Iran. Desalination and
Water Treatment. 2016; 57(54): 1-9. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1162206.
Gelca R, Hayhoe K, Scott-Fleming I, Crow C, Dawson D, Patiño R. Climate-water quality relationships in
Texas reservoirs. Hydrological Processes. 2016; 30(1): 12-29. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10545.
Mohammadi Sh, Mohammadi M, Tavakkoli K, Zamani E, Mohadeth Z, Mogtahedi F, et al. Effects of
Different Doses of Simvastatin on Lead-Induced Kidney Damage in Balb/C Male Mice. Pharmaceutical
Sciences. 2015; 20(4): 157-162.
Po M, Kaercher JD, Nancarrow BE. Literature review of factors influencing public perceptions of water
reuse: Citeseer. 2003. PMID: 7973368.
Neil N, Malmfors T, Slovic P. Intuitive toxicology: Expert and lay judgments of chemical risks. Toxicol
Pathol. 1994; 22(2): 198-201. PMID: 7973368.
Rajabizadeh A, Afsarinejad MR. Evaluation of Knowledge and Attitude of Kerman Residents about the
Usage of Bottled Water for Drinking and Cooking Purposes. Kerman medical sciences university. 2004;
(4): 243-50.
Auslander BA, Langlois PH. Toronto tap water: perception of its quality and use of alternatives. Can J
Public Health. 1992; 84(2): 99-102. PMID: 8334617.
Johnson BB. Do reports on drinking water quality affect customers' concerns? Experiments in report
content. Risk Anal. 2003; 23(5): 985-98. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00375. PMID: 12969413.
de França Doria M. Factors influencing public perception of drinking water quality. Water policy. 2010;
(1): 1-19. doi: 10.2166/wp.2009.051. PMID: 26223687, PMCID: PMC4520261.
Karnani A. The Mirage of Marketing to the Bottom of the Pyramid. California Management Review. 2007;
(4): 90-111. doi: 10.2307/41166407.
Keramati H, Mahvi AH, Abdulnezhad L. The survey of physical and chemical quality of Gonabad drinking
water in spring and summer of 1386. The Horizon of Medical Sciences. 2007; 13(3): 25-32.
Dupont D, Adamowicz WL, Krupnick A. Differences in water consumption choices in Canada: the role of
socio-demographics, experiences, and perceptions of health risks. J Water Health. 2010; 8(4): 671-86. doi:
2166/wh.2010.143. PMID: 20705979.
Doria M. Bottled water versus tap water: understanding consumers-preferences. J water health. 2006; 271:
Figueroa ME, Kincaid DL. Social, cultural and behavioral correlates of household water treatment and
storage. Household water treatment and safe storage Geneva: World Health Organization. 2007.
Beamer PI, Luik CE, Abrell L, Campos S, Martínez ME, Sáez AE. Concentration of trichloroethylene in
breast milk and household water from Nogales, Arizona. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(16): 9055-61. doi:
1021/es301380d. PMID: 22827160, PMCID: PMC3699401.
Castleden H, Crooks VA, van Meerveld I. Examining the public health implications of drinking water–
related behaviours and perceptions: A face‐to‐face exploratory survey of residents in eight coastal
communities in British Columbia and Nova Scotia. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien.
doi: 10.1111/cag.12169.
Dupont DP, Jahan N. Defensive spending on tap water substitutes: the value of reducing perceived health
risks. Journal of water and health. 2012; 10(1): 56-68. doi: 10.2166/wh.2011.097. PMID: 22361702.
Victory KR. Risk Perception, Drinking Water Source and Quality in a Low-Income Latino Community
along the US-Mexico Border. 2014.
Fattahi S, Alipourfard S, Habibi H. Analysis of determinants of mineral water consumption: the case of
Tehran. Rev Contem Bus Res. 2013; 2(1): 41-55.
Edris B, Hamed B, Kord Mostafapour F. Determination of hydrophobic and hydrophilic fractions of natural
organic matter in raw water of Zahedan water treatment plant. Health Scope. 2012; 1(1): 25-8.
Bazrafshan E, Biglari H, Kord Mostafapour F. Humic acid removal from aqueous environments by
electrocoagulation process using iron electrodes. Journal of Chemistry. 2011; 3(1): 36-46. doi:
1155/2012/876739.
Biglari H, Jonidi Jafari A, Kord Mostafapour F, Bazafshan E. Removal of Dissolved Organic Carbon from
aqueous solution by Fenton Oxidation Process. Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2012;
(1): 70-80.
Sajjadi A, Afsharnia M, Azrah K, Sargolzai Javan N, Biglari H. Humic Acid Degradation via Solar Photo- Fenton Process in Aqueous Environment. Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and Environment. 2015; 2(3):
-12.
Bazrafshan E, Joneidi Jaafari A, Kord Mostafapour F, Biglari H. Humic acid removal from aqueous
environments by electrocoagulation process duad with adding hydrogen peroxide. Iranian Journal of Health
and Environment. 2012; 5(2): 211-24.
Van der Bruggen B, Goossens H, Everard P, Stemgee K, Rogge W. Cost-benefit analysis of central
softening for production of drinking water. J Environ Manage. 2009; 91(2): 541-9. doi:
1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.024. PMID: 19837505.
Shams M, Mohamadi A, Sajadi A. Evaluation of corrosion and scaling potential of water in rural water
supply distribution networks of Tabas, Iran. World Appl Sci J. 2012; 17(11): 1484-89.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 KNOWLEDGE KINGDOM PUBLISHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
