Effect of education based on socio-ecological theory on bullying in students
An educational study
Keywords:
Students, Bullying, Socio-ecological theoryAbstract
Background: Bullying and victimization behaviors are a serious problem for students, peers, parents, and school teachers. These behaviors usually persist and cause communication problems. Objective: To determine the effect of education based on the socio-ecological theory on bullying in students. Methods: This educational study was of the field-trial type, and carried out on 237 middle school students in Gonabad City (Iran), from September 2015 to May 2016. The intervention group consisted of 147 students, and 90 were assigned to a control group. The intervention (Five sessions of bullying and victimization were discussed) based socio-ecological theory at two levels: individual level and interpersonal level. The intervention was carried out on the students, their parents, and school teachers in two schools. To this end, the multi-stage random sampling was done. Prior to the intervention, the Illinois questionnaire as well as a researcher-made questionnaire was completed. The researcher-made questionnaire included demographic characteristics with regard to living with both parents, one parent or no parents (a guardian) and questions about bullying behaviors in the family as well as about knowledge and attitudes towards bullying. Subsequently, the questionnaire was completed by the students one month and six months after the intervention. The data was analyzed by IBM-SPSS version 21, using ANOVA, multiple regression, repeated measures, Chi-square, and Man-Whitney U test. Results: The findings showed that there was no significant difference between the mean attitude of the students before and after training. However, the mean score of bullying behaviors in the experimental group was significantly reduced one month after the intervention, but it increased after six months. Moreover, there was a significant difference in terms of bullying behaviors between the intervention and control groups (p=0.0001). Furthermore, a significant relationship was found between the mothers' education level and the students' bullying behaviors (p=0.009 Conclusion: Bullying is an important problem that affects schools and influences the academic and social capabilities of students. In this regard, the role of educators is the most important, and education on the basis of the socio-ecological model was proved to be effective in reducing bullying. Therefore, educational intervention should be taken at two levels of school and family.References
Fleming LC, Jacobsen KH. Bullying and symptoms of depression in chilean middle school students. J Sch
Health. 2009; 79(3): 130-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.0397.x. PMID: 19207519.
Rivers I. Morbidity among bystanders of bullying behavior at school: concepts, concerns, and clinical/
research issues. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2012; 24(1): 11-6. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2012.003. PMID:
Austin S, Reynolds G, Barnes S. School leadership and counselors working together to address bullying.
Education. 2012; 2(133): 283-90.
Farrington DP, Ttofi MM. How to reduce school bullying. Victims and Offenders. 2009; 4(4): 321-6. doi:
1080/15564880903227255.
Volk A, Craig W, Boyce W, King M. Adolescent risk correlates of bullying and different types of
victimization. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2006; 18(4): 575-86. doi: 10.1515/IJAMH.2006.18.4.575. PMID:
Garmaroudi G, Mohammad K, Omidvari S, Jafarpour S. Prevalence of Bullying and its Associated Factors
among Iranian Middle School Students. Health Education & Health Promotion. 2014; 2: 9-20.
Jones SE, Haslam SA, York L, Ryan MK. Rotten apple or rotten barrel? Social identity and children's
responses to bullying. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2008; 26(1): 117-32. doi:
1348/026151007X200385.
Mohebi S, Sharifirad G, Shahsiah M, Botlani S, Matlabi M, Rezaeian M. The effect of assertiveness
training on student's academic anxiety. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012; 62(3 Suppl 2): S37-41. PMID: 22768456.
Whitted KS, Dupper DR. Best practices for preventing or reducing bullying in schools. Children &
Schools. 2005; 27(3): 167-75. doi: 10.1093/cs/27.3.167.
Mahmud S, Bakar ZBA, Djaffri HB. Bullying Type in Gender Perspective in Senior High School Students,
South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research. 2014;
(12): 39-47.
Espelage DL, Swearer SM. A social-ecological model for bullying prevention and intervention. Handbook
of bullying in schools: An international perspective. 2009: 61-72.
Rigby K. Children and bullying: How parents and educators can reduce bullying at school. Blackwell
Publishing; 2008.
Espelage DL, Napolitano SS. Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and
where do we go from here? School Psychology Review. 2003; 32: 365-83.
Swearer SM, Doll B. Bullying in schools: An ecological framework. Journal of Emotional Abuse. 2001;
(213): 7-23. doi: 10.1300/J135v02n02_02.
Swearer SM, Espelage DL, Vaillancourt T, Hymel S. What can be done about school bullying? Linking
research to educational practice. Educational researcher. 2010; 39(1): 38-47. doi:
3102/0013189X09357622.
Ayers SL, Wagaman MA, Geiger JM, Bermudez-Parsai M, Hedberg E. Examining school-based bullying
interventions using multilevel discrete time hazard modeling. Prevention science. 2012; 13(5): 539-50. doi:
1007/s11121-012-0280-7. PMID: 22878779, PMCID: PMC3896994.
Lim SJJ. Bullying among refugee, immigrant and native born children in elementary and middle schools: A
socio-ecological model analysis. 2012.
Lee CH. Personal and interpersonal correlates of bullying behaviors among korean middle school students.
Interpersonal Violence. 2010; 25(1): 152-76. doi: 10.1177/0886260508329124. PMID: 19252069.
Leff SS. Bullying and peer victimization at school: Considerations and future directions. School
Psychology Review. 2007; 36(3): 406.
Mishna F, Pepler D, Wiener J. Factors associated with perceptions and responses to bullying situations by
children, parents, teachers, and principals. Victims and Offenders. 2006; 1(3): 255-88. doi:
1080/15564880600626163.
Casebeer CM. School bullying: Why quick fixes do not prevent school failure. Preventing school failure:
Alternative education for children and youth. 2012; 56(3): 165-71. doi: 10.1080/1045988X.2011.633283.
Akbari Balootbangan A, Talepasand S. Validation of the Illinois bullying scale in primary school students
of Semnan, Iran. Journal of fundamentals of mental health. 2015; 17(4): 178-85.
Rogers SL. The effectiveness of group interventions in reducing the level of bullying behaviors in middle
school settings. Indiana State University; 2007.
Newman‐Carlson D, Horne AM. Bully busters: A psychoeducational intervention for reducing bullying
behavior in middle school students. Journal of Counseling & Development. 2004; 82(3): 259-67. doi:
1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00309.x.
Espelage DL, Rao MA, De La Rue L. Current research on school-based bullying: A social-ecological
perspective. Social Distress and the Homeless. 2013; 22(1): 21-7. doi: 10.1179/1053078913Z.0000000002.
Salmivalli C. Peer-led intervention campaign against school bullying: who considered it useful, who
benefited? Educational Research. 2001; 43(3): 263-78. doi: 10.1080/00131880110081035.
Esteki Azad N, Amiri SH. Effectiveness of reduction of bullying training on the rate of victim behaviors in
children. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2012; 18: 175-83.
Losey RA. An Evaluation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program’s Effectiveness in a High School
Setting. University of Cincinnati; 2009.
Purseyed R, Amiri SH, Molavi H. Effectiveness of education programs to reduce bullying in fifth grade.
Journal of Research on Exceptional Children. 2010; 10(2): 113-12.
Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR. School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal,
relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent health. 2009; 45(4): 368-75. doi:
1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021. PMID: 19766941, PMCID: PMC2751860.
MoghtadaieM, Sholeh SA, Lahijanian Z, Amin Jafari AS, Padash Z. The reduction of victim, bullying
behaviors and the increase of prosocial behaviors in victim primary school boy children. Journal of
Contemporary Researsh In Business. 2012; 4(2): 462-71.
Healy KL, Sanders MR, Iyer A. Parenting practices, children’s peer relationships and being bullied at
school. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2015; 24(1): 127-40. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9820-4.
Cross D. Solution not problems: Evidence-based processes and strategies. National Coalition Against
Bullying. National Conference; 2007.
Hornby G. Parental involvement in childhood education: Building effective school-family partnerships:
Springer Science & Business Media. 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8379-4.
Bradshaw CP, Waasdorp TE, Johnson SL. Overlapping verbal, relational, physical, and electronic forms of
bullying in adolescence: influence of school context. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology.
; 44(3): 494-508. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.893516. PMID: 24738548.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 KNOWLEDGE KINGDOM PUBLISHING
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
