Development of a questionnaire to measure perceived reasons for divorce seeking

An instrument development study

Authors

  • Nouzar Nakhaee M.D. Professor, Neuroscience Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Keywords:

Divorce, Questionnaire, Separation, Social problems

Abstract

Background: Subjective accounts of divorce seeking individuals is a useful complement to sociological and psychological causes of divorce at both individual and community level. Regarding the increasing trend of divorce worldwide, the need for a questionnaire measuring subjective reasons of divorce is felt more and more.  Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and validate perceived causes of a divorce questionnaire in Iranian society. Methods: This was an instrument development study that carried out in 2016, based on extensive literature reviews and interviews with individuals referring to “Family Intervention Centers to Reduce Divorce” in Kerman, Fars and Alborz provinces (Iran). At first, 38 items expressing the perceived reasons for divorce were extracted; then, 29 items were used in the questionnaire according to the experts’ judgment. After that, the questionnaire was given to 570 participants. The structural validity was evaluated using two methods: exploratory factor analysis via principle axis factoring, and known group comparisons by paired-samples t-test. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was also examined by calculating the Cronbach's alpha and corrected item-total correlation. SPSS version 20 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean age (± SD) of women and men was 32.3 (±8.9) and 36.8 (±10.6), respectively. Based on an expert panel, content validity of 29 items was approved. Using principle axis factoring and varimax rotation, two components were extracted. These two factors were called “instrumental/external reasons” and “expressive and relationship-centered reasons.” Factor loading of all 29 items was higher than 0.32. Cronbach's alpha of the two subscales was 0.84 and 0.85, respectively. Corrected item-scale coefficient of all items was more than 0.2. Conclusions: According to the acceptable validity and reliability of the Perceived Reasons for Divorce Seeking Questionnaire, it can be used to ascertain people`s reasons for divorce seeking.

References

Myers JE, Madathil J, Tingle LR. Marriage satisfaction and wellness in India and the United States: a

preliminary comparison of arranged marriages and marriages of choice. J Counsel Develop. 2005; 83: 183- 90. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2005.tb00595.x.

Waite LJ, Lehrer ER. The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: a comparative analysis.

Popul Dev Rev. 2003; 29(2): 255–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00255.x. PMID: 19129930, PMCID:

PMC2614329.

Amato PR. Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. J Marriage Fam. 2010; 72(3):

-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.x.

Härkönen J. Divorce: Trends, Patterns, Causes, and Consequences. In: The Wiley-Blackwell companion to

the sociology of families. John Wiley & Sons; 2014: 303-22.

Safizadeh M, Nakhaee N. Causes of increasing trend of divorce in Iranian community: what do the experts

think? J Fam Med. 2016; 3(4): 1064.

Aghajanian A, Thompson V. Recent divorce trend in Iran. J Divorce Remarriage 2013; 54(2): 112-25. doi:

1080/10502556.2012.752687.

Amato PR, Previti D. People's reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. J

Fam Issues. 2003; 24(5): 602-26. doi: 10.1177/0192513X03024005002.

Mojtabai R, Stuart EA, Hwang I, Eaton WW, Sampson N, Kessler RC. Long-term effects of mental

disorders on marital outcomes in the National Comorbidity Survey ten-year follow-up. Soc Psychiatry

Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017; 52(10): 1217-26. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1373-1. PMID: 28378065.

Slovic P. Perception of Risk. Science. 1987; 236: 280-5. doi: 10.1126/science.3563507.

Castro FG, Barrera M, Martinez CR. The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions

between fidelity and fit. Prev Sci. 2004; 5(1): 41-5. doi: 10.1023/B:PREV.0000013980.12412.cd. PMID:

Nakhaee N, Jadidi N. Why do some teens turn to drugs? a focus group study of drug users' experiences. J

Addict Nursing. 2009; 20(4): 203-8. doi: 10.3109/10884600903291158.

Khojastehmehr R, Takrimi A. Identification of divorce factors of women. Journal of Applied Sciences.

; 9(20): 3758-63. doi: 10.3923/jas.2009.3758.3763.

Honarian M, Younesi SJ. Investigating the causes of divorce in the family courts in Tehran. Journal of

Clinical Psychology. 2011; 1(3): 127-35.

Barikani A, Ebrahim SM, Navid M. The cause of divorce among men and women referred to marriage and

legal office in Qazvin, Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 2012; 4(5): 184-91. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n5p184. PMID:

Abramson J, Abramson ZH. Research methods in community medicine: surveys, epidemiological research,

programme evaluation, clinical trials. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.

Nakhaee N. Questionnaire design & analysis. 1st ed. Kerman: Gera Publications; 2013.

Osborne JW, Costello AB. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting

the most from your analysis. Pan-Pacific Management Review. 2009; 12(2): 131-46.

McDonald RP. Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press; 2013.

Scott SB, Rhoades GK, Stanley SM, Allen ES, Markman HJ. Reasons for divorce and recollections of

premarital intervention: Implications for improving relationship education. Couple Family Psychol. 2013;

(2): 131-45. doi: 10.1037/a0032025. PMID: 24818068.

Beavers AS, Lounsbury JW, Richards JK, Huck SW, Skolits GJ, Esquivel SL. Practical considerations for

using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical assessment, research & evaluation.

; 18(6).

Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were

proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of clinical epidemiology.

; 60(1): 34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. PMID: 17161752.

Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.

Published

2021-12-24

Issue

Section

Articles